IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i21-22p4281-4288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative descriptions of patient perceptions about fall risks, prevention strategies and self‐identity: Analysis of fall prevention Motivational Interviewing conversations

Author

Listed:
  • Hiroko Kiyoshi‐Teo
  • Kathlynn Northrup‐Snyder
  • Mary Robert Davis
  • Ellen Garcia
  • Amy Leatherwood
  • Shigeko (Seiko) Izumi

Abstract

Background Older adults are often reluctant to engage in fall prevention activities. Objectives To understand how older adults respond to fall prevention and identify attributes that affect their responses to fall prevention. Methods Qualitative content analysis of Fall Prevention Motivational Interviewing conversations that were conducted as an intervention for a fall prevention study in the USA. We report the methods, results and discussions using the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research checklist. Results Conversations from 30 participants were analysed. Participants showed various responses to fall prevention from acceptance and engagement to ambivalence to denial or giving up. Three attributes affecting how they responded to fall prevention were as follows: (a) their perception of fall risks, (b) their perception about fall prevention strategies and (c) self‐identity. If participants perceived that their fall risks were temporary or modifiable, they were more likely to engage in fall prevention. If participants perceived that their fall risks were permanent or unmodifiable, they seemed to have difficulty accepting fall risks or gave up engaging in fall prevention strategies. Participants were more willing to adopt fall prevention strategies that involved minor adjustments but expressed more resistance to adopting strategies that required major adjustments. Further, their response to accepting or not accepting fall prevention was influenced by their perception of whether the fall risks and fall prevention strategies aligned with their self‐identity. Conclusion Findings underscore the importance of understanding older adults’ self‐identify and perceptions about fall prevention. Relevance to clinical practice Exploring older adults’ self‐identity and perceptions about fall prevention can be useful to support their engagement in fall prevention.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiroko Kiyoshi‐Teo & Kathlynn Northrup‐Snyder & Mary Robert Davis & Ellen Garcia & Amy Leatherwood & Shigeko (Seiko) Izumi, 2020. "Qualitative descriptions of patient perceptions about fall risks, prevention strategies and self‐identity: Analysis of fall prevention Motivational Interviewing conversations," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4281-4288, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4281-4288
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15465
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helen Frost & Pauline Campbell & Margaret Maxwell & Ronan E O’Carroll & Stephan U Dombrowski & Brian Williams & Helen Cheyne & Emma Coles & Alex Pollock, 2018. "Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing on adult behaviour change in health and social care settings: A systematic review of reviews," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-39, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justin C. Baker & Craig J. Bryan & AnnaBelle O. Bryan & Christopher J. Button, 2021. "The Airman’s Edge Project: A Peer-Based, Injury Prevention Approach to Preventing Military Suicide," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4281-4288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.