IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i19-20p3556-3566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses' attitudes towards support for and communication about sexual health—A qualitative study from the perspectives of oncological nurses

Author

Listed:
  • Catharina Frid Annerstedt
  • Stinne Glasdam

Abstract

Aim and objectives To explore nurses' articulations of support and communication regarding sexual health with patients. Background Sexual health is adversely effected by cancer and various oncological treatments. Patients' often have the experience that healthcare professionals do not talk about sexual health. Method Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with seven nurses in Southern Sweden. Content analyses were made, inspired by Foucault's concepts of power, discipline and normalisation. SRQR checklist was used. Results Patients' sexual health had low priority in the oncological clinic from the perspective of nurses. The medical logic directed nurses' articulations about sexual health towards a physical view, understood as sex, and sexual problems, which could be treated pharmacologically. Further, nurses articulated a sexual norm that sex belongs to young people and younger persons in permanent, monogamous and heterosexual relationships. This norm‐governed nurses' inclusion and exclusion of patients in communication about sexual health. According to nurses, most patients did not mention sex, but some patients challenged the clinic's norms. Assessing sexual health problems, nurses often engaged other professions and thereby became gatekeepers for patients' options for getting help. Conclusions From the perspective of nurses, nurses' support and communication regarding sexual health with patients with cancer diagnosis were relatively absent and had a low priority in an oncological clinic. Overall, the nurses had the power to set the agenda about patients' sexual health in the oncological clinic. The clinical gaze became a disciplinary technique that tacitly defined by whom, in what way and how sexual health could be articulated in an oncological clinic. Relevance to clinical practice By illuminating nurses' preconceptions, thoughts and actions in relation to cancer patients' sexual health, the results invite practitioners to reflect upon and discuss the challenges, opportunities and limitations in providing inclusive and supportive sexual health care to cancer patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Catharina Frid Annerstedt & Stinne Glasdam, 2019. "Nurses' attitudes towards support for and communication about sexual health—A qualitative study from the perspectives of oncological nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3556-3566, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:19-20:p:3556-3566
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14949
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14949?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter K O'Shaughnessy & Colin Ireland & Lemuel Pelentsov & Laws A Thomas & Adrian J Esterman, 2013. "Impaired sexual function and prostate cancer: a mixed method investigation into the experiences of men and their partners," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(23-24), pages 3492-3502, December.
    2. Yati Afiyanti & Ariesta Milanti, 2013. "Physical sexual and intimate relationship concerns among Indonesian cervical cancer survivors: A phenomenological study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 151-156, June.
    3. Speer, Susan A. & Tucker, Samantha R. & McPhillips, Rebecca & Peters, Sarah, 2017. "The clinical communication and information challenges associated with the psychosexual aspects of prostate cancer treatment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 17-26.
    4. Hordern, Amanda Jane & Street, Annette F., 2007. "Constructions of sexuality and intimacy after cancer: Patient and health professional perspectives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(8), pages 1704-1718, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandra Pettersson & Stinne Glasdam, 2020. "Becoming a good nurse – Socialisation of newly employed nurses into the oncological clinic," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2495-2507, July.
    2. Eilís M. McCaughan & Carrie Flannagan & Kader Parahoo & Sharon L. Bingham & Nuala Brady & John Connaghan & Roma Maguire & Samantha Thompson & Suneil Jain & Michael Kirby & Seán R. O’Connor, 2021. "Effects of a Brief E-Learning Resource on Sexual Attitudes and Beliefs of Healthcare Professionals Working in Prostate Cancer Care: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-11, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emslie, Carol & Browne, Susan & MacLeod, Una & Rozmovits, Linda & Mitchell, Elizabeth & Ziebland, Sue, 2009. "'Getting through' not 'going under': A qualitative study of gender and spousal support after diagnosis with colorectal cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1169-1175, March.
    2. White, I.D. & Faithfull, S. & Allan, H., 2013. "The re-construction of women's sexual lives after pelvic radiotherapy: A critique of social constructionist and biomedical perspectives on the study of female sexuality after cancer treatment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 188-196.
    3. Valentina Bressan & Annamaria Bagnasco & Giuseppe Aleo & Fiona Timmins & Michela Barisone & Monica Bianchi & Ramona Pellegrini & Loredana Sasso, 2017. "Mixed‐methods research in nursing – a critical review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 2878-2890, October.
    4. Eilís M. McCaughan & Carrie Flannagan & Kader Parahoo & Sharon L. Bingham & Nuala Brady & John Connaghan & Roma Maguire & Samantha Thompson & Suneil Jain & Michael Kirby & Seán R. O’Connor, 2021. "Effects of a Brief E-Learning Resource on Sexual Attitudes and Beliefs of Healthcare Professionals Working in Prostate Cancer Care: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-11, September.
    5. Tucker, Samantha R. & Speer, Susan A. & Peters, Sarah, 2016. "Development of an explanatory model of sexual intimacy following treatment for localised prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 80-88.
    6. Dhuha Youssef Wazqar, 2020. "Sexual health care in cancer patients: A survey of healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes and barriers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4239-4247, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:19-20:p:3556-3566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.