IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i5-6p1262-1275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring communication during the journey from noticing bodily changes to a diagnosis of endometrial cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Cook
  • Margaret Brunton
  • Tepora Pukepuke
  • Ai Ling Tan

Abstract

Aims and objectives To understand women's perspectives about the trajectory from first bodily changes to diagnosis. Background With endometrial cancer, as with all gynaecological cancers, early diagnosis is key to successful outcomes. However, women do not always seek clinical advice early. Previously, this gap has been referred to as a “delay,” blamed on fear or refusal to acknowledge symptoms. Methods A qualitative research project which involved face‐to‐face interviews with 16 women who had presented with symptoms of endometrial cancer. The paucity of research in the trajectory of women who experience a diagnosis of endometrial cancer required an exploratory overview of the data. Accordingly, an inductive thematic analysis was conducted using the framework of Braun and Clarke (Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2006, 77). Results Women and health professionals both resorted to satisficing, using heuristics to make decisions about the importance of symptoms depending on their severity and duration. Most women initially determined that the bodily changes were within the realms of normal. Time to diagnosis was also affected by the following: women's long‐standing assumptions; communication with health professionals; liminality—women oscillating between their self‐assessment that these changes were something significant or nothing important; and gaps in health literacy. Conclusions The journey from noticing bodily changes to diagnosis was a nonlinear trajectory. Women worked to make sense of what was happening to them, informed by their sociocultural environment. In particular, confusion about the purpose of cervical screening led a number of participants who had regular smears to assume they were “safe” from cancer worries. Relevance to clinical practice Women and some health professionals may be unfamiliar with symptoms potentially indicative of endometrial cancer. There may be structural and communication barriers for women navigating healthcare systems. It is vital that nurses take time both to listen to women and to provide them with resources to enhance their health literacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Cook & Margaret Brunton & Tepora Pukepuke & Ai Ling Tan, 2018. "Exploring communication during the journey from noticing bodily changes to a diagnosis of endometrial cancer," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1262-1275, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:1262-1275
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14173
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Facione, Noreen C. & Facione, Peter A., 2006. "The cognitive structuring of patient delay in breast cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(12), pages 3137-3149, December.
    2. Brandner, Susanne & Müller-Nordhorn, Jacqueline & Stritter, Wiebke & Fotopoulou, Christina & Sehouli, Jalid & Holmberg, Christine, 2014. "Symptomization and triggering processes: Ovarian cancer patients' narratives on pre-diagnostic sensation experiences and the initiation of healthcare seeking," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 123-130.
    3. Don Nutbeam, 2009. "Defining and measuring health literacy: what can we learn from literacy studies?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 54(5), pages 303-305, October.
    4. Granek, Leeat & Fergus, Karen, 2012. "Resistance, agency, and liminality in women's accounts of symptom appraisal and help-seeking upon discovery of a breast irregularity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(10), pages 1753-1761.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne Sidenius & Lenore Manderson & Ole Mogensen & Martin Rudnicki & Lars Mikael Alling Møller & Helle Ploug Hansen, 2019. "“But this is a good cancer:” Patient perceptions of endometrial cancer in Denmark," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 245-256, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Unger-Saldaña, Karla & Infante-Castañeda, Claudia B., 2011. "Breast cancer delay: A grounded model of help-seeking behaviour," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(7), pages 1096-1104, April.
    2. Hanne Søberg Finbråten & Peter Nowak & Robert Griebler & Éva Bíró & Mitja Vrdelja & Rana Charafeddine & Lennert Griese & Henrik Bøggild & Doris Schaeffer & Thomas Link & Zdenek Kucera & Julien Mancini, 2022. "The HLS 19 -COM-P, a New Instrument for Measuring Communicative Health Literacy in Interaction with Physicians: Development and Validation in Nine European Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Shuaijun Guo & Xiaoming Yu & Orkan Okan, 2020. "Moving Health Literacy Research and Practice towards a Vision of Equity, Precision and Transparency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Hannah R. Goss & Craig Smith & Laura Hickey & Johann Issartel & Janis Morrissey & Celine Murrin & Ailbhe Spillane & Sarahjane Belton, 2022. "Using Co-Design to Develop a Health Literacy Intervention with Socially Disadvantaged Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Hicks, Alison, 2022. "The missing link: Towards an integrated health and information literacy research agenda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    6. Kristy Howells & Tara Coppinger, 2022. "The Forgotten Age Phase of Healthy Lifestyle Promotion? A Preliminary Study to Examine the Potential Call for Targeted Physical Activity and Nutrition Education for Older Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Chinn, Deborah, 2011. "Critical health literacy: A review and critical analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 60-67, July.
    8. Harris-Fry, Helen & Saville, Naomi M. & Paudel, Puskar & Manandhar, Dharma S. & Cortina-Borja, Mario & Skordis, Jolene, 2022. "Relative power: Explaining the effects of food and cash transfers on allocative behaviour in rural Nepalese households," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    9. Madalina Adina Coman & Andreea Marcu & Razvan Mircea Chereches & Jarkko Leppälä & Stephan Van Den Broucke, 2020. "Educational Interventions to Improve Safety and Health Literacy Among Agricultural Workers: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Arthur Dubowicz & Peter J. Schulz, 2014. "Functional Validity of a Judgment Skills Measure within the Concept of Health Literacy for Sleeping Disorder Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Karuntharat Boonchuaythanasit & Chakkrit Ponrachom & Bradley J. Cardinal, 2021. "Alcohol Consumption Behavior among Undergraduate Students in Thailand: Development of a New Causal Relationship Model," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, March.
    12. Aboud, Frances E. & Singla, Daisy R., 2012. "Challenges to changing health behaviours in developing countries: A critical overview," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(4), pages 589-594.
    13. Lindsay G. Oades & Aaron Jarden & Hanchao Hou & Corina Ozturk & Paige Williams & Gavin R. Slemp & Lanxi Huang, 2021. "Wellbeing Literacy: A Capability Model for Wellbeing Science and Practice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-12, January.
    14. Haw, Jennie & Cunningham, Shannon & O'Doherty, Kieran C., 2018. "Epistemic tensions between people living with asthma and healthcare professionals in clinical encounters," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 34-40.
    15. J. S. Blumenthal-Barby & Heather Krieger, 2015. "Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Medical Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(4), pages 539-557, May.
    16. Frances Marjorie May Lloyd & Alistair Hewison & Nikolaos Efstathiou, 2018. "“It just made me feel so desolate”: Patients’ narratives of weight gain following laparoscopic insertion of a gastric band," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 732-742, February.
    17. Thomas Ernst Dorner & Christian Lackinger & Sandra Haider & Katharina Viktoria Stein, 2021. "Lifestyle Parameters in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and in the General Adult Population—Trends over Five Years: Results of the Austrian National Health Interview Series," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-13, September.
    18. Sarah Mantwill & Silvia Monestel-Umaña & Peter J Schulz, 2015. "The Relationship between Health Literacy and Health Disparities: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    19. Rianne Honigh-de Vlaming & Annemien Haveman-Nies & Inge Bos-Oude Groeniger & Eveline Hooft van Huysduynen & Lisette Groot & Pieter Veer, 2014. "Loneliness Literacy Scale: Development and Evaluation of an Early Indicator for Loneliness Prevention," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 989-1001, May.
    20. Macdonald, Sara & Conway, Elaine & Bikker, Annemieke & Browne, Susan & Robb, Kathryn & Campbell, Christine & Steele, Robert JC. & Weller, David & Macleod, Una, 2019. "Making sense of bodily sensations: Do shared cancer narratives influence symptom appraisal?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 31-39.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:1262-1275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.