IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i3-4p621-630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tailoring of the Tell‐us Card communication tool for nurses to increase patient participation using Intervention Mapping

Author

Listed:
  • Elise van Belle
  • Sandra M G Zwakhalen
  • Josien Caris
  • Ann Van Hecke
  • Getty Huisman‐de Waal
  • Maud Heinen

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe the tailoring of the Tell‐us Card intervention for enhanced patient participation to the Dutch hospital setting using Intervention Mapping as a systematic approach. Background Even though patient participation is essential in any patient‐to‐nurse encounter, care plans often fail to take patients’ preferences into account. The Tell‐us Card intervention seems promising, but needs to be tailored and tested before implementation in a different setting or on large scale. Design Description of the Intervention Mapping framework to systematically tailor the Tell‐us Card intervention to the Dutch hospital setting. Methods Intervention Mapping consists of: (i) identification of the problem through needs assessment and determination of fit, based on patients and nurses interviews and focus group interviews; (ii) developing a logic model of change and matrices, based on literature and interviews; (iii) selection of theory‐based methods and practical applications; (iv) producing programme components and piloting; (v) planning for adoption, implementation and sustainability; and (vi) preparing for programme evaluation. Results Knowledge, attitude, outcome expectations, self‐efficacy and skills were identified as the main determinants influencing the use of the Tell‐us Card. Linking identified determinants and performance objectives with behaviour change techniques from the literature resulted in a well‐defined and tailored intervention and evaluation plan. Conclusions The Tell‐us Card intervention was adapted to fit the Dutch hospital setting and prepared for evaluation. The Medical Research Council framework was followed, and the Intervention Mapping approach was used to prepare a pilot study to confirm feasibility and relevant outcomes. Relevance to clinical practice This article shows how Intervention Mapping is applied within the Medical Research Council framework to adapt the Tell‐us Card intervention, which could serve as a guide for the tailoring of similar interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Elise van Belle & Sandra M G Zwakhalen & Josien Caris & Ann Van Hecke & Getty Huisman‐de Waal & Maud Heinen, 2018. "Tailoring of the Tell‐us Card communication tool for nurses to increase patient participation using Intervention Mapping," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 621-630, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:621-630
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13968
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13968?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mojtaba Vaismoradi & Sue Jordan & Mari Kangasniemi, 2015. "Patient participation in patient safety and nursing input – a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5-6), pages 627-639, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mojtaba Vaismoradi & Flores Vizcaya-Moreno & Sue Jordan & Ingjerd Gåre Kymre & Mari Kangasniemi, 2020. "Disclosing and Reporting Practice Errors by Nurses in Residential Long-Term Care Settings: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Madeline Sands & Robert Aunger, 2020. "Determinants of hand hygiene compliance among nurses in US hospitals: A formative research study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-29, April.
    3. Jimson Joseph Chumbula & Umoh, Edet O. (PhD) & Endra, Michael & Otosi, Okosienen & Anake, Monday & Nkanga, Dominic & Unwana, Udomoh & Usani, Patrick & Ejoh, Vincent & Amu, Denis, 2020. "Patients’ Relative Satisfaction with Nursing Care: A Case Study of Federal Neuro-Psychiatric Hospital, Calabar," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(12), pages 163-172, December.
    4. Beatriz Vallina Acha & Estrella Durá Ferrandis & Mireia Ferri Sanz & Maite Ferrando García, 2021. "Engaging People and Co-Producing Research with Persons and Communities to Foster Person-Centred Care: A Meta-Synthesis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-25, November.
    5. Anne Clancy & Marianne Mahler, 2016. "Nursing staffs’ attentiveness to older adults falling in residential care – an interview study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1405-1415, May.
    6. Mamdooh Alzyood & Debra Jackson & Joanne Brooke & Helen Aveyard, 2018. "An integrative review exploring the perceptions of patients and healthcare professionals towards patient involvement in promoting hand hygiene compliance in the hospital setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1329-1345, April.
    7. Mojtaba Vaismoradi & Susanna Tella & Patricia A. Logan & Jayden Khakurel & Flores Vizcaya-Moreno, 2020. "Nurses’ Adherence to Patient Safety Principles: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:621-630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.