IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i15-16p3139-3147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using qualitative data to enhance our understanding of the reasons young people decline Structured Diabetes Education programmes

Author

Listed:
  • Vivien Coates
  • Geraldine Horigan
  • Marian Carey
  • Mark Davies

Abstract

Aim To explore the reasons young people with type 1 diabetes decline Structured Diabetes Education from the perspectives of the young people themselves, their parents and diabetes educators. Background Structured Diabetes Education programmes that are evidence based and quality assured are a key component to empowering people with diabetes to self‐manage effectively. However, research reveals that uptake of structured education programmes is disappointingly low. Design Qualitative cross‐sectional study involving participants from Northern Ireland and England. Methods Twenty young people with type 1 diabetes (13–22 years) who had declined Structured Diabetes Education within the past 2 years, 17 parents of a young person with type 1 diabetes and 16 diabetes educators participated in semistructured interviews and focus groups. Results Three main themes emerged from across all three groups: timing, access and communication issues. In addition, a lack of understanding by the referrer was cited by some young people and their parents. Diabetes educators were sympathetic and understood many of the reasons why Structured Diabetes Education was declined. Solutions were proposed to overcome expressed barriers. Conclusions Although the expressed reasons for declining might suggest that the young people simply did not prioritise education, this study adds a more nuanced scenario to the debate. The interviews revealed the tensions that exist between people's daily commitments and their need to self‐manage their diabetes. The young people and their parents must be given a much stronger sense of the importance of Structured Diabetes Education and ways to accommodate attendance must be sought. Diabetes educators must be able to better promote the importance of Structured Diabetes Education. Relevance to clinical practice As optimal glycaemic control is so vital for long‐term health, there is an urgent need to understand how to respond more fully to the needs of young people who have type 1 diabetes.

Suggested Citation

  • Vivien Coates & Geraldine Horigan & Marian Carey & Mark Davies, 2018. "Using qualitative data to enhance our understanding of the reasons young people decline Structured Diabetes Education programmes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 3139-3147, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:15-16:p:3139-3147
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14508
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14508?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lawton, Julia & Rankin, David, 2010. "How do structured education programmes work? An ethnographic investigation of the dose adjustment for normal eating (DAFNE) programme for type 1 diabetes patients in the UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 486-493, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:15-16:p:3139-3147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.