IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i1-2p355-362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experiences of registered nurses transitioning from employment in acute care to primary health care—quantitative findings from a mixed‐methods study

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Ashley
  • Elizabeth Halcomb
  • Angela Brown
  • Kath Peters

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe the experiences of registered nurses who transition from acute to primary health care (PHC) employment. Background Internationally the provision of health care in PHC settings is increasing. Nurses are moving from acute care employment to meet the growing demand for a PHC workforce. However, little is known about the transition experiences of these nurses. Design A sequential mixed‐methods study comprising a survey, and semi‐structured interviews. This study reports on survey findings relating to the transition experience. Methods Convenience and snowballing techniques were used to recruit 111 registered nurses who had transitioned from Australian acute settings to PHC employment within the last 5 years. An online survey gathered data relating to personal and professional demographics, type of PHC setting and transition experiences. Results Most respondents (n = 90, 81.1%) reported receiving some orientation, although the length and content varied considerably. Those working in metropolitan locations were more likely to report concerns associated with their orientation, with respondents from rural or remote locations more likely to have access to a preceptor than city/metropolitan respondents. Just under half of respondents found prioritising workload (n = 47; 42.7%) or organisational knowledge (n = 45; 40.9%) difficult or very difficult, and 47.7% (n = 53) felt isolated or unsupported. 49.5% (n = 55) reported being overwhelmed with the new role either sometimes or regularly. Barriers to transitioning successfully included limited employer support to attend professional development activities. Conclusions Availability of specific support measures may assist in the transition process. Findings from our study should be considered by employers when recruiting nurses new to PHC, and when designing orientation and ongoing education programmes. Relevance to clinical practice This study highlights the challenges faced by nurses who transition from acute care into PHC employment. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to successful transitions enhances the process for future recruitment and retention of PHC nurses. This evidence can inform managers, educators and policymakers in developing support programmes for nurses moving into PHC.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Ashley & Elizabeth Halcomb & Angela Brown & Kath Peters, 2018. "Experiences of registered nurses transitioning from employment in acute care to primary health care—quantitative findings from a mixed‐methods study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 355-362, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:355-362
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13930
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13930?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christine Ashley & Elizabeth Halcomb & Angela Brown, 2016. "Transitioning from acute to primary health care nursing: an integrative review of the literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2114-2125, August.
    2. Geraldine McCarthy & Nicola Cornally & Joe Moran & Marie Courtney, 2012. "Practice nurses and general practitioners: perspectives on the role and future development of practice nursing in Ireland," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(15‐16), pages 2286-2295, August.
    3. Elizabeth Halcomb & Moira Stephens & Julianne Bryce & Elizabeth Foley & Christine Ashley, 2016. "Nursing competency standards in primary health care: an integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1193-1205, May.
    4. Huei Ying Lee & Min‐Tao Hsu & Pei‐Ling Li & Rebecca S Sloan, 2013. "‘Struggling to be an insider’: a phenomenological design of new nurses’ transition," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5-6), pages 789-797, March.
    5. Pauline Murray‐Parahi & Michelle DiGiacomo & Debra Jackson & Patricia M Davidson, 2016. "New graduate registered nurse transition into primary health care roles: an integrative literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3084-3101, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clare Harvey & Desley Hegney & Agnieszka Sobolewska & Diane Chamberlain & Elspeth Wood & Lisa Wirihana & Sandy Mclellan & Joyce Hendricks & Troy Wake, 2019. "Developing a community-based nursing and midwifery career pathway – A narrative systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christine Ashley & Angela Brown & Elizabeth Halcomb & Kath Peters, 2018. "Registered nurses transitioning from acute care to primary healthcare employment: A qualitative insight into nurses' experiences," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 661-668, February.
    2. Susan McInnes & Kath Peters & Andrew Bonney & Elizabeth Halcomb, 2017. "A qualitative study of collaboration in general practice: understanding the general practice nurse's role," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1960-1968, July.
    3. Gerard M Fealy & Daniela Rohde & Mary Casey & Anne‐Marie Brady & Josephine Hegarty & Catriona Kennedy & Martin McNamara & Pauline O'Reilly & Geraldine Prizeman, 2015. "Facilitators and barriers in expanding scope of practice: findings from a national survey of Irish nurses and midwives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3615-3626, December.
    4. Arita Murwani & Santoso Santoso & Eny Lestari & Endang S. Sulaeman, 2019. "The Health Promotion Model of Public Health Program for Elderly," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(7), pages 119-119, July.
    5. Anna Willman & Kaisa Bjuresäter & Jan Nilsson, 2020. "Newly graduated nurses' clinical competencies and need for further training in acute care hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2209-2220, July.
    6. Virpi Maijala & Kerttu Tossavainen & Hannele Turunen, 2015. "Identifying nurse practitioners' required case management competencies in health promotion practice in municipal public primary health care. A two‐stage modified Delphi study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(17-18), pages 2554-2561, September.
    7. Elizabeth Halcomb & Moira Stephens & Julianne Bryce & Elizabeth Foley & Christine Ashley, 2016. "Nursing competency standards in primary health care: an integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1193-1205, May.
    8. Sonja Dawson & Doug Elliott & Debra Jackson, 2017. "Nurses' contribution to short‐term humanitarian care in low‐ to middle‐income countries: An integrative review of the literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 3950-3961, December.
    9. Lei Cheng & Marion E Broome & Sheng Feng & Yan Hu, 2017. "Factors influencing the implementation of evidence in Chinese nursing practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 5103-5112, December.
    10. Grant R Kinghorn & Elizabeth J Halcomb & Terry Froggatt & Stuart DM Thomas, 2017. "Transitioning into new clinical areas of practice: An integrative review of the literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4223-4233, December.
    11. Mohamed Toufic El Hussein & Olive Fast, 2020. "Gut feeling: A grounded theory study to identify clinical educators' reasoning processes in putting students on a learning contract," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1-2), pages 75-84, January.
    12. Maria Mulka‐Gierek & Bartosz Foroncewicz & Michał Florczak & Leszek Pączek & Marek Krawczyk & Krzysztof Mucha, 2016. "The use of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and analgesics by liver transplant recipients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1001-1005, April.
    13. Anna Willman & Kaisa Bjuresäter & Jan Nilsson, 2021. "Insufficiently supported in handling responsibility and demands: Findings from a qualitative study of newly graduated nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1-2), pages 83-92, January.
    14. Elizabeth Halcomb & Christine Ashley, 2017. "Australian primary health care nurses most and least satisfying aspects of work," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 535-545, February.
    15. Torunn Kitty Vatnøy & Tor‐Ivar Karlsen & Bjørg Dale, 2019. "Exploring nursing competence to care for older patients in municipal in‐patient acute care: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(17-18), pages 3339-3352, September.
    16. Clare Harvey & Desley Hegney & Agnieszka Sobolewska & Diane Chamberlain & Elspeth Wood & Lisa Wirihana & Sandy Mclellan & Joyce Hendricks & Troy Wake, 2019. "Developing a community-based nursing and midwifery career pathway – A narrative systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:355-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.