IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i9-10p1193-1205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing competency standards in primary health care: an integrative review

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Halcomb
  • Moira Stephens
  • Julianne Bryce
  • Elizabeth Foley
  • Christine Ashley

Abstract

Aims and objectives This paper reports an integrative review of the literature on nursing competency standards for nurses working in primary health care and, in particular, general practice. Background Internationally, there is growing emphasis on building a strong primary health care nursing workforce to meet the challenges of rising chronic and complex disease. However, there has been limited emphasis on examining the nursing workforce in this setting. Design Integrative review. Methods A comprehensive search of relevant electronic databases using keywords (e.g. ‘competencies’, ‘competen*’ and ‘primary health care’, ‘general practice’ and ‘nurs*’) was combined with searching of the Internet using the Google scholar search engine. Experts were approached to identify relevant grey literature. Key websites were also searched and the reference lists of retrieved sources were followed up. The search focussed on English language literature published since 2000. Results Limited published literature reports on competency standards for nurses working in general practice and primary health care. Of the literature that is available, there are differences in the reporting of how the competency standards were developed. A number of common themes were identified across the included competency standards, including clinical practice, communication, professionalism and health promotion. Many competency standards also included teamwork, education, research/evaluation, information technology and the primary health care environment. Conclusion Given the potential value of competency standards, further work is required to develop and test robust standards that can communicate the skills and knowledge required of nurses working in primary health care settings to policy makers, employers, other health professionals and consumers. Relevance to clinical practice Competency standards are important tools for communicating the role of nurses to consumers and other health professionals, as well as defining this role for employers, policy makers and educators. Understanding the content of competency standards internationally is an important step to understanding this growing workforce.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Halcomb & Moira Stephens & Julianne Bryce & Elizabeth Foley & Christine Ashley, 2016. "Nursing competency standards in primary health care: an integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1193-1205, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:9-10:p:1193-1205
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13224
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13224?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geraldine McCarthy & Nicola Cornally & Joe Moran & Marie Courtney, 2012. "Practice nurses and general practitioners: perspectives on the role and future development of practice nursing in Ireland," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(15‐16), pages 2286-2295, August.
    2. Chouh‐Jiaun Lin & Chi‐Ho Hsu & Tsai‐Chung Li & Nigel Mathers & Yu‐Chu Huang, 2010. "Measuring professional competency of public health nurses: development of a scale and psychometric evaluation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(21‐22), pages 3161-3170, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Torunn Kitty Vatnøy & Tor‐Ivar Karlsen & Bjørg Dale, 2019. "Exploring nursing competence to care for older patients in municipal in‐patient acute care: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(17-18), pages 3339-3352, September.
    2. Sonja Dawson & Doug Elliott & Debra Jackson, 2017. "Nurses' contribution to short‐term humanitarian care in low‐ to middle‐income countries: An integrative review of the literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 3950-3961, December.
    3. Clare Harvey & Desley Hegney & Agnieszka Sobolewska & Diane Chamberlain & Elspeth Wood & Lisa Wirihana & Sandy Mclellan & Joyce Hendricks & Troy Wake, 2019. "Developing a community-based nursing and midwifery career pathway – A narrative systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Mohamed Toufic El Hussein & Olive Fast, 2020. "Gut feeling: A grounded theory study to identify clinical educators' reasoning processes in putting students on a learning contract," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1-2), pages 75-84, January.
    5. Elizabeth Halcomb & Christine Ashley, 2017. "Australian primary health care nurses most and least satisfying aspects of work," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 535-545, February.
    6. Susan McInnes & Kath Peters & Andrew Bonney & Elizabeth Halcomb, 2017. "A qualitative study of collaboration in general practice: understanding the general practice nurse's role," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1960-1968, July.
    7. Arita Murwani & Santoso Santoso & Eny Lestari & Endang S. Sulaeman, 2019. "The Health Promotion Model of Public Health Program for Elderly," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(7), pages 119-119, July.
    8. Christine Ashley & Elizabeth Halcomb & Angela Brown & Kath Peters, 2018. "Experiences of registered nurses transitioning from employment in acute care to primary health care—quantitative findings from a mixed‐methods study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 355-362, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christine Ashley & Elizabeth Halcomb & Angela Brown & Kath Peters, 2018. "Experiences of registered nurses transitioning from employment in acute care to primary health care—quantitative findings from a mixed‐methods study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 355-362, January.
    2. Gerard M Fealy & Daniela Rohde & Mary Casey & Anne‐Marie Brady & Josephine Hegarty & Catriona Kennedy & Martin McNamara & Pauline O'Reilly & Geraldine Prizeman, 2015. "Facilitators and barriers in expanding scope of practice: findings from a national survey of Irish nurses and midwives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3615-3626, December.
    3. Virpi Maijala & Kerttu Tossavainen & Hannele Turunen, 2015. "Identifying nurse practitioners' required case management competencies in health promotion practice in municipal public primary health care. A two‐stage modified Delphi study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(17-18), pages 2554-2561, September.
    4. Susan McInnes & Kath Peters & Andrew Bonney & Elizabeth Halcomb, 2017. "A qualitative study of collaboration in general practice: understanding the general practice nurse's role," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1960-1968, July.
    5. Maria Mulka‐Gierek & Bartosz Foroncewicz & Michał Florczak & Leszek Pączek & Marek Krawczyk & Krzysztof Mucha, 2016. "The use of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and analgesics by liver transplant recipients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1001-1005, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:9-10:p:1193-1205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.