IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i7-8p1042-1052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attention to nurses’ rewarding – an interview study of registered nurses working in primary and private healthcare in Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Jaana Seitovirta
  • Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen
  • Lasse Mitronen
  • Sara De Gieter
  • Tarja Kvist

Abstract

Aims and objectives To identify meaningful types of rewards and the consequences of rewards as expressed by Finnish registered nurses working in primary and private healthcare. Background Previous studies have found significant associations between nurses’ rewards and both their commitment and job satisfaction. Furthermore, appropriate rewards can have beneficial effects on factors including workforce stability and occupational satisfaction that are highly important in times of nurse shortages. Design A cross‐sectional, qualitative interview study. Methods Data were collected via individual semi‐structured interviews (n = 20) with registered nurses working in Finland's primary and private healthcare, and subjected to qualitative content analysis. Results Six meaningful types of rewards were identified by the registered nurses: Financial compensation and benefits, Work‐Life balance, Work content, Professional development, Recognition, and Supportive leadership. Rewards encouraged respondents to perform their work correctly and reinforced occupational satisfaction, but also caused feelings of envy and stress. Conclusions It is essential to pay attention to nurses’ preferences for particular rewards and to reward management. When designing effective reward systems for registered nurses, it is not sufficient to provide financial rewards alone, as various kinds of non‐financial rewards are both meaningful and necessary. Relevance to clinical practice When trying to improve registered nurses’ commitment and job satisfaction through reward management, it is important to listen to nurses’ opinions to create a reward system that integrates financial and non‐financial rewards and is fair from their perspective. Healthcare organisations that offer registered nurses a holistic reward system are more likely to retain satisfied and committed nurses at a time of increasing nursing shortages.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaana Seitovirta & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen & Lasse Mitronen & Sara De Gieter & Tarja Kvist, 2017. "Attention to nurses’ rewarding – an interview study of registered nurses working in primary and private healthcare in Finland," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(7-8), pages 1042-1052, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:7-8:p:1042-1052
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13459
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13459?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kiisa Hulkko-Nyman & Daria Sarti & Anu Hakonen & Christina Sweins, 2012. "Total Rewards Perceptions and Work Engagement in Elder-Care Organizations," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 24-49, January.
    2. Kelsey B Morrison & Susan A Korol, 2014. "Nurses' perceived and actual caregiving roles: identifying factors that can contribute to job satisfaction," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3468-3477, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siedine K. Coetzee & Heather K.S. Laschinger, 2018. "Toward a comprehensive, theoretical model of compassion fatigue: An integrative literature review," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 4-15, March.
    2. Siti Subaryani Binti Zainol & Suhaili binti Mohd Hussin & Maisarah Syazwani binti Othman, 2016. "Determinants of Employee Engagement in Hotel Industry in Malaysia. A Theoretical Mode," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 6(3), pages 1-9, July.
    3. Jasenka Vujanić & Nada Prlić & Robert Lovrić, 2020. "Nurses’ Self-Assessment of Caring Behaviors in Nurse–Patient Interactions: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Mohammed Usman & Dr. Ibrahim Garba Muhammad & Dr. Najafi Auwal Ibrahim, 2020. "Effect of Perceived Organizational Support on Non-Monetary Compensation and Employee Performance at Federal University of Kashere Gombe State," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(10), pages 367-373, October.
    5. Hina Fayyaz & Ajmal Waheed, 2023. "Organization-Set High-Performance Goals and Employee Expediency Syndrome: An Underlying Mechanism of Supervisor Expediency and Illegitimate Tasks," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:7-8:p:1042-1052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.