IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p5160-5168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hospital passports, patient safety and person‐centred care: A review of documents currently used for people with intellectual disabilities in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Northway
  • Stacey Rees
  • Michelle Davies
  • Sharon Williams

Abstract

Aims and objectives To review hospital passports currently in use for people with intellectual disabilities in the UK and to make recommendations for practice. Background Hospital passports have been introduced internationally to address communication barriers that may limit access to appropriate health care for people with intellectual disabilities. They are viewed as promoting patient safety and person‐centred care but their format may vary, they are not always used appropriately, and hence, their effectiveness may be limited. Design Qualitative content analysis. Methods Sixty hospital passports in use in the UK were reviewed against a coding frame by two members of the research team. Areas of interest included key patient and primary care information, support network details, consent and capacity, support required in relation to activities of daily living, length of the document and completion details. Results were entered into Excel. Results Considerable variation was found between documents in terms of terminology, length and format. Most included information regarding communication and support needs although some omitted important information such as allergies, risk assessment and need for reasonable adjustments. Conclusions Considerable variation exists between current hospital passports, which may limit their effectiveness: key information required may not be included and/or it may not be easy to locate. Greater standardisation of documents is required, but this process should include input from all key stakeholders. Relevance to clinical practice Internationally nurses provide care for people with intellectual disabilities and others with communication difficulties. Hospital passports are one way of enhancing safety and person‐centred care, need to be accessed and used as a basis for care planning. However, variation in format may limit this effectiveness and nurses should work with others to develop a more standardised approach, which better meets the needs of all stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Northway & Stacey Rees & Michelle Davies & Sharon Williams, 2017. "Hospital passports, patient safety and person‐centred care: A review of documents currently used for people with intellectual disabilities in the UK," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 5160-5168, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:5160-5168
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14065
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandra Braaf & Robin Riley & Elizabeth Manias, 2015. "Failures in communication through documents and documentation across the perioperative pathway," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1874-1884, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiina Syyrilä & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen & Marja Härkänen, 2020. "Communication issues contributing to medication incidents: Mixed‐method analysis of hospitals’ incident reports using indicator phrases based on literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2466-2481, July.
    2. Susanne Friis Søndergaard & Vibeke Lorentzen & Erik Elgaard Sørensen & Kirsten Frederiksen, 2017. "The documentation practice of perioperative nurses: a literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1757-1769, July.
    3. Lisa Wiyartanti & Choon Hak Lim & Myon Woong Park & Jae Kwan Kim & Gyu Hyun Kwon & Laehyun Kim, 2020. "Resilience in the Surgical Scheduling to Support Adaptive Scheduling System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Gitte Bunkenborg & Lars Smith‐Hansen & Ingrid Poulsen, 2019. "Implementing mandatory early warning scoring impacts nurses’ practice of documenting free text notes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2990-3000, August.
    5. Lotta Wikström & Kerstin Eriksson & Bengt Fridlund & Mats Nilsson & Kristofer Årestedt & Anders Broström, 2017. "The clinical applicability of a daily summary of patients’ self‐reported postoperative pain—A repeated measure analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4675-4684, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:5160-5168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.