IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i13-14p1757-1769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The documentation practice of perioperative nurses: a literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Susanne Friis Søndergaard
  • Vibeke Lorentzen
  • Erik Elgaard Sørensen
  • Kirsten Frederiksen

Abstract

Aims and objective To explore and present the existing knowledge of the documentation practices of perioperative nurses in the operating room. Background Studies demonstrate that the documentation of nursing care provided is important for the continuity of patient care as well as patient safety. Nurses find that documenting their perioperative services is important to the surgical pathway; however, a number of studies indicate that the documentation practices of perioperative nurses are characterised by subjectivity, randomness and poor quality. Design A literature review with a systematic search of scientific material. Method The content of the studies included was analysed using content analysis as suggested by Krippendorff. The materials were acquired by searching electronic databases. The search was performed for the period 1995–2015 and resulted in 12 studies. Results Three general themes were found to be important for perioperative nurses’ documentation practices: (1) the documentation tool must be adapted to the clinical practice; (2) nurses document to improve patient safety and protect themselves legally; and (3) traditions and conditions for documentation. Conclusion Nurses considered documenting their perioperative practices very important. It was of vital importance that the tool used be adapted to the actual clinical practice and to relevant regulations regarding form and content. Nurses’ subjective perceptions of and opinions on the effect of documentation influenced their documentation practices, which were widely governed by habits and traditions. Nurses document to safeguard patients against errors but also to protect their own legal status. Nurses also use documentation as proof of their nursing and as ‘a window’ to gain recognition for their professional practice. Relevance to clinical practice Our review demonstrates that a focus on the documentation traditions of perioperative nurses combined with training, structure and improved technical tools may facilitate the documentation and thereby improve patient safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Susanne Friis Søndergaard & Vibeke Lorentzen & Erik Elgaard Sørensen & Kirsten Frederiksen, 2017. "The documentation practice of perioperative nurses: a literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1757-1769, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:1757-1769
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13445
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13445?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teija‐Kaisa Aholaakko, 2011. "Reducing surgical nurses’ aseptic practice‐related stress," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(23‐24), pages 3339-3350, December.
    2. Sandra Braaf & Robin Riley & Elizabeth Manias, 2015. "Failures in communication through documents and documentation across the perioperative pathway," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1874-1884, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiina Syyrilä & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen & Marja Härkänen, 2020. "Communication issues contributing to medication incidents: Mixed‐method analysis of hospitals’ incident reports using indicator phrases based on literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2466-2481, July.
    2. Lisa Wiyartanti & Choon Hak Lim & Myon Woong Park & Jae Kwan Kim & Gyu Hyun Kwon & Laehyun Kim, 2020. "Resilience in the Surgical Scheduling to Support Adaptive Scheduling System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Gitte Bunkenborg & Lars Smith‐Hansen & Ingrid Poulsen, 2019. "Implementing mandatory early warning scoring impacts nurses’ practice of documenting free text notes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2990-3000, August.
    4. Lotta Wikström & Kerstin Eriksson & Bengt Fridlund & Mats Nilsson & Kristofer Årestedt & Anders Broström, 2017. "The clinical applicability of a daily summary of patients’ self‐reported postoperative pain—A repeated measure analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4675-4684, December.
    5. Ruth Northway & Stacey Rees & Michelle Davies & Sharon Williams, 2017. "Hospital passports, patient safety and person‐centred care: A review of documents currently used for people with intellectual disabilities in the UK," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 5160-5168, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:1757-1769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.