IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i21-22p3345-3353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urinary incontinence and its management in patients aged 65 and older in orthopaedic care – what nursing and rehabilitation staff know and do

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Hälleberg Nyman
  • Henrietta Forsman
  • Joan Ostaszkiewicz
  • Ami Hommel
  • Ann Catrine Eldh

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe what nursing and rehabilitation staff know and do with regard to urinary incontinence and risk of urinary incontinence in patients 65 years or older undergoing hip surgery. Background Urinary incontinence is a common but often neglected issue for older people. Despite the existence of evidence‐based guidelines on how to assess, manage and prevent urinary incontinence, there are indications that these guidelines are not applied in hospital care. Design A qualitative study with descriptive design was conducted in two orthopaedic units. Methods Forty‐six interviews and 36 observations of care were conducted from January–October 2014 and analysed with qualitative content analysis. Results Enrolled nurses performed most of the care related to bladder function, with focus on urinary catheterisation and preventing urinary tract infection and urinary retention. Registered nurses’ role in urinary matters mainly comprised documentation, while the rehabilitation staff focused on making it possible for the patient to be independent in toileting. The nursing staff considered urinary incontinence a common condition for older people and that it was convenient for the patients to have an indwelling catheter or incontinence pad/pant, although they acknowledged some of the risks associated with these procedures. Conclusions Urinary incontinence is not a priority in orthopaedic care, and urinary incontinence guidelines are not applied. Further, attitudes and actions are mainly characterised by a lack of urinary incontinence knowledge and the nursing and rehabilitation staff do not take a team approach to preventing and managing urinary incontinence. Relevance to clinical practice An increased focus on knowledge on urinary incontinence and evidence‐based guidelines is needed. To secure evidence‐based practice, the team of nursing and rehabilitation staff and managers must be aligned and work actively together, also including the patient in the team.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Hälleberg Nyman & Henrietta Forsman & Joan Ostaszkiewicz & Ami Hommel & Ann Catrine Eldh, 2017. "Urinary incontinence and its management in patients aged 65 and older in orthopaedic care – what nursing and rehabilitation staff know and do," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3345-3353, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:21-22:p:3345-3353
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13686
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13686?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lindsay Dingwall & Ella Mclafferty, 2006. "Do nurses promote urinary continence in hospitalized older people?: an exploratory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(10), pages 1276-1286, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyejin Yoon & Lesa Huber & Chulwon Kim, 2021. "Sustainable Aging and Leisure Behaviors: Do Leisure Activities Matter in Aging Well?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:21-22:p:3345-3353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.