IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i10p1276-1286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do nurses promote urinary continence in hospitalized older people?: an exploratory study

Author

Listed:
  • Lindsay Dingwall
  • Ella Mclafferty

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this paper is to explore whether nurses working in elderly medicine and in acute medical settings promote urinary continence in older people or in reality use containment strategies. Background. Untreated urinary incontinence in older adults can result in prolonged hospital admission and increased risk of admission to long‐term care. Urinary incontinence can also have severe psychosocial effects on older people. Most studies relating to this topic have relied on quantitative approaches to data collection with a seeming lack of qualitative investigation into how nursing staff promote urinary continence in hospitalized older people. Method. Focus groups and one‐to‐one semi‐structured interviews were carried out in two NHS regions in Scotland. Registered and non‐Registered Nurses were invited to participate. Five focus groups (n = 17) and four single interviews (n = 4) were conducted. Data generated were analysed thematically using QSR N‐VIVO 2. Findings. Some nurses believe that older people accept urinary incontinence as a consequence of ageing. Lack of assessment results in older people being labelled as incontinent of urine. Assessment strategies in medicine for the elderly tend to focus on product identification and management of incontinence. Although nurses from all clinical areas identify the importance of promoting continence, the problem continues to be contained rather than treated. Conflicting clinical priorities, varying staff approaches to urinary continence and deficits in education are cited among the barriers to promoting continence. Conclusions. The results suggest that nurses continue to contain urinary incontinence rather than promoting continence in older people. Relevance to clinical practice. Nursing staff need to be aware of the impact of untreated urinary incontinence on older people. Practitioners should promote continence rather than employing containment strategies. A validated assessment tool for older people needs to be developed. Views of older people should be sought regarding their attitudes towards urinary incontinence.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindsay Dingwall & Ella Mclafferty, 2006. "Do nurses promote urinary continence in hospitalized older people?: an exploratory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(10), pages 1276-1286, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:10:p:1276-1286
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01381.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01381.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01381.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Hälleberg Nyman & Henrietta Forsman & Joan Ostaszkiewicz & Ami Hommel & Ann Catrine Eldh, 2017. "Urinary incontinence and its management in patients aged 65 and older in orthopaedic care – what nursing and rehabilitation staff know and do," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3345-3353, November.
    2. Hyejin Yoon & Lesa Huber & Chulwon Kim, 2021. "Sustainable Aging and Leisure Behaviors: Do Leisure Activities Matter in Aging Well?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:10:p:1276-1286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.