IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i15-16p2256-2265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To ask, or not to ask: the hesitation process described by district nurses encountering women exposed to intimate partner violence

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Sundborg
  • Lena Törnkvist
  • Nouha Saleh‐Stattin
  • Per Wändell
  • Ingrid Hylander

Abstract

Aims and objectives To improve the understanding of district nurses' experiences of encountering women exposed to intimate partner violence. Background Intimate partner violence is a public health issue that influences all aspects of affected women's lives; it is thus of great relevance to identify intimate partner violence. District nurses in primary health care in Sweden encounter women of all ages and are therefore in a unique position to identify intimate partner violence and provide nursing care. However, studies indicate that several barriers have kept nurses from identifying intimate partner violence. Consequently deeper understanding of district nurses' encounters with women exposed to intimate partner violence is needed. Design A qualitative study using grounded theory method. Methods Interviews with 11 district nurses in primary health care in Sweden. Results The hesitation process is central in these encounters. Several barriers to asking and factors that facilitated asking impacted the hesitation process. Under the influence of these factors, district nurses moved from being unaware that identifying intimate partner violence was their professional responsibility, to becoming ambivalent about asking, to starting to prepare themselves to ask about intimate partner violence. The presence of factors that facilitated asking finally made district nurses feel prepared, and then they decided to ask women about intimate partner violence. Conclusions The concept of managing the hesitation process could be used to be incorporated in continuing education and training. Barriers and facilitators concerning organisational factors found in this study may be specific to the Swedish health care system, but the concept of the hesitation process is applicable in similar contexts and perhaps to other issues about which it is difficult to ask. Relevance to clinical practice This study illuminates the importance of a supportive work environment in reducing district nurses' hesitation to ask about intimate partner violence and to propose continuing education, training and supervision for district nurses regarding intimate partner violence.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Sundborg & Lena Törnkvist & Nouha Saleh‐Stattin & Per Wändell & Ingrid Hylander, 2017. "To ask, or not to ask: the hesitation process described by district nurses encountering women exposed to intimate partner violence," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(15-16), pages 2256-2265, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:15-16:p:2256-2265
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12992
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12992?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Inger Wallin Lundell & Louise Eulau & Frida Bjarneby & Margareta Westerbotn, 2018. "Women's experiences with healthcare professionals after suffering from gender‐based violence: An interview study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 949-957, March.
    2. Encarnación Martínez-García & Verónica Montiel-Mesa & Belén Esteban-Vilchez & Beatriz Bracero-Alemany & Adelina Martín-Salvador & María Gázquez-López & María Ángeles Pérez-Morente & María Adelaida Alv, 2021. "Sexist Myths Emergency Healthcare Professionals and Factors Associated with the Detection of Intimate Partner Violence in Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-15, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:15-16:p:2256-2265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.