IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i5-6p731-743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Care zoning in a psychiatric intensive care unit: strengthening ongoing clinical risk assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Antony Mullen
  • Vincent Drinkwater
  • Terry J Lewin

Abstract

Aims and objectives To implement and evaluate the care zoning model in an eight‐bed psychiatric intensive care unit and, specifically, to examine the model's ability to improve the documentation and communication of clinical risk assessment and management. Background Care zoning guides nurses in assessing clinical risk and planning care within a mental health context. Concerns about the varying quality of clinical risk assessment prompted a trial of the care zoning model in a psychiatric intensive care unit within a regional mental health facility. The care zoning model assigns patients to one of 3 ‘zones’ according to their clinical risk, encouraging nurses to document and implement targeted interventions required to manage those risks. Design An implementation trial framework was used for this research to refine, implement and evaluate the impact of the model on nurses' clinical practice within the psychiatric intensive care unit, predominantly as a quality improvement initiative. Methods The model was trialled for three months using a pre‐ and postimplementation staff survey, a pretrial file audit and a weekly file audit. Informal staff feedback was also sought via surveys and regular staff meetings. Results This trial demonstrated improvement in the quality of mental state documentation, and clinical risk information was identified more accurately. There was limited improvement in the quality of care planning and the documentation of clinical interventions. Nurses' initial concerns over the introduction of the model shifted into overall acceptance and recognition of the benefits. Conclusions The results of this trial demonstrate that the care zoning model was able to improve the consistency and quality of risk assessment information documented. Care planning and evaluation of associated outcomes showed less improvement. Relevance to clinical practice Care zoning remains a highly applicable model for the psychiatric intensive care unit environment and is a useful tool in guiding nurses to carry out routine patient risk assessments.

Suggested Citation

  • Antony Mullen & Vincent Drinkwater & Terry J Lewin, 2014. "Care zoning in a psychiatric intensive care unit: strengthening ongoing clinical risk assessment," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(5-6), pages 731-743, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:5-6:p:731-743
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12493
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12493?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marion Tower & Wendy Chaboyer & Quentine Green & Kirsten Dyer & Marianne Wallis, 2012. "Registered nurses’ decision‐making regarding documentation in patients’ progress notes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(19pt20), pages 2917-2929, October.
    2. Jamie Ross & Len Bowers & Duncan Stewart, 2012. "Conflict and containment events in inpatient psychiatric units," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(15‐16), pages 2306-2315, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christine W. Nibbelink & Barbara B. Brewer, 2018. "Decision‐making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 917-928, March.
    2. Gitte Bunkenborg & Lars Smith‐Hansen & Ingrid Poulsen, 2019. "Implementing mandatory early warning scoring impacts nurses’ practice of documenting free text notes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2990-3000, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:5-6:p:731-743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.