IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i19pt20p2917-2929.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Registered nurses’ decision‐making regarding documentation in patients’ progress notes

Author

Listed:
  • Marion Tower
  • Wendy Chaboyer
  • Quentine Green
  • Kirsten Dyer
  • Marianne Wallis

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To examine registered nurses’ decision‐making when documenting care in patients’ progress notes. Background. What constitutes effective nursing documentation is supported by available guidelines. However, ineffective documentation continues to be cited as a major cause of adverse events for patients. Decision‐making in clinical practice is a complex process. To make an effective decision, the decision‐maker must be situationally aware. The concept of situation awareness and its implications for making safe decisions has been examined extensively in air safety and more recently is being applied to health. Design and methods. The study was situated in a naturalistic paradigm. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 17 registered nurses who used think‐aloud research methods when making decisions about documenting information in patients’ progress notes. Follow‐up interviews were conducted to validate interpretations. Data were analysed systematically for evidence of cues that demonstrated situation awareness as nurses made decisions about documentation. Results. Three distinct decision‐making scenarios were illuminated from the analysis: the newly admitted patient, the patient whose condition was as expected and the discharging patient. Nurses used mental models for decision‐making in documenting in progress notes, and the cues nurses used to direct their assessment of patients’ needs demonstrated situation awareness at different levels. Conclusions. Nurses demonstrate situation awareness at different levels in their decision‐making processes. While situation awareness is important, it is also important to use an appropriate decision‐making framework. Cognitive continuum theory is suggested as a decision‐making model that could support situation awareness when nurses made decisions about documenting patient care. Relevance to clinical practice. Because nurses are key decision‐makers, it is imperative that effective decisions are made that translate into safe clinical care. Including situation awareness training, combined with employing cognitive continuum theory as a decision‐making framework, provides a powerful means of guiding nurses’ decision‐making.

Suggested Citation

  • Marion Tower & Wendy Chaboyer & Quentine Green & Kirsten Dyer & Marianne Wallis, 2012. "Registered nurses’ decision‐making regarding documentation in patients’ progress notes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(19pt20), pages 2917-2929, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:19pt20:p:2917-2929
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04135.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04135.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04135.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antony Mullen & Vincent Drinkwater & Terry J Lewin, 2014. "Care zoning in a psychiatric intensive care unit: strengthening ongoing clinical risk assessment," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(5-6), pages 731-743, March.
    2. Gitte Bunkenborg & Lars Smith‐Hansen & Ingrid Poulsen, 2019. "Implementing mandatory early warning scoring impacts nurses’ practice of documenting free text notes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2990-3000, August.
    3. Christine W. Nibbelink & Barbara B. Brewer, 2018. "Decision‐making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 917-928, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:19pt20:p:2917-2929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.