IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i7-8p986-995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: striving for ‘controlled co‐existence’

Author

Listed:
  • Adeline Cooney
  • Lorraine Mee
  • Dympna Casey
  • Kathy Murphy
  • Collette Kirwan
  • Eimear Burke
  • Yvonne Conway
  • Denise Healy
  • Brona Mooney
  • Jill Murphy
  • The PRINCE Team

Abstract

Aims and objectives To understand the meaning of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for people and their response to this disease. Background COPD is a major cause of disability and death. The symptoms of COPD have the potential to impact on every aspect of a person's day‐to‐day life. To date most published qualitative studies have focused on the ‘experience’ of breathlessness and its impact on the person. Few studies have sought to ‘understand’ the meaning of COPD to people and their response to this disease. This study aimed to address this gap. Design Straussian grounded theory guided study design. Grounded theory was considered appropriate for this study because of its focus on how people respond to and act on the problems they encounter. Methods Data were collected through semi‐structured interviews with 26 people with COPD. Study participants were recruited from general practices on the western seaboard of Ireland. Results Two interrelated categories were identified as contributing to ‘co‐existing with COPD’: ‘hiding’ and ‘battling’. ‘Co‐existing with COPD’ was conceptualised as the core category. The potential to ‘co‐exist’ with COPD was influenced by mediating factors. Conclusion The Theory of Co‐existing with COPD was generated from the data. This theory explains the delicate balance people with COPD maintain to ‘co‐exist with COPD’. ‘Controlled co‐existence’ enables the person to feel in control and live life to the optimum. This is a fragile balance however and the unpredictability of COPD can tip the person into ‘strained co‐existence’ or ‘uncontrolled co‐existence’. Relevance to clinical practice Understanding the experience of living with COPD and the balances involved in ‘co‐existing with COPD’ can help health professionals provide more focused and empowered client care. Enabling people to achieve ‘controlled co‐existence’ with COPD challenges health professionals to educate people with COPD on how to effectively manage their disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Adeline Cooney & Lorraine Mee & Dympna Casey & Kathy Murphy & Collette Kirwan & Eimear Burke & Yvonne Conway & Denise Healy & Brona Mooney & Jill Murphy & The PRINCE Team, 2013. "Life with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: striving for ‘controlled co‐existence’," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(7-8), pages 986-995, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:7-8:p:986-995
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04285.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04285.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04285.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ingrid Charlotte Andersen & Thora Grothe Thomsen & Poul Bruun & Uffe Bødtger & Lise Hounsgaard, 2017. "Patients' and their family members' experiences of participation in care following an acute exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A phenomenological‐hermeneutic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4877-4889, December.
    2. Lawless, Michael T. & Tieu, Matthew & Feo, Rebecca & Kitson, Alison L., 2021. "Theories of self-care and self-management of long-term conditions by community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-ethnography," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:7-8:p:986-995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.