IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i23-24p3289-3299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sexual risk factors for partner age discordance in adolescent girls and their male partners

Author

Listed:
  • Dianne Morrison‐Beedy
  • Yinglin Xia
  • Denise Passmore

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate differences in sexual risk factors between adolescent girls reporting similar‐aged or older sex partners. Background Adolescent girls are at significant risk of heterosexual‐acquired HIV infection and other long‐term reproductive health issues. Sexual partner age discordance in teen girls has been correlated with STIs, lack of protection, multiple partners and earlier age of sexual transition. Design A descriptive study comparing girls currently involved with age‐discordant partners to those with similar‐aged partners. Two‐sample t‐test for continuous variables and chi‐squared test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables were used to compare groups. Methods Baseline data from 738 sexually active, urban, adolescent girls aged 15–19 were analysed to determine which behaviours were more likely to occur in girls with older partners. Data were collected as part of a gender‐specific HIV‐prevention intervention in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) tailored to adolescent girls. Results Multiple reported sexual risk behaviours were found to significantly differ between the two groups at baseline. Overall, girls with older partners had more episodes of sexual instances (vaginal, anal and oral). Specific sexual risk behaviours were found to be statistically significant between the two groups. Girls with older partners started having sex at earlier ages, had more lifetime sexual partners, higher incidents of STIs and were reluctant to discuss using condoms with their partners. Girls with similar‐aged partners were less willing to engage in risky sexual behaviours. Conclusions Findings from this investigation support data from other studies. Relationships with older male partners place adolescent girls at increased risk of HIV/STIs and unintended pregnancy. Relevance to clinical practice Adolescent girls in age‐discordant relationships are at risk of immediate and long‐term sexual health morbidities. Identifying girls who are at increased risk by asking tailored questions will enable nurses to recommend appropriate diagnostics for this population and provide age‐specific counselling.

Suggested Citation

  • Dianne Morrison‐Beedy & Yinglin Xia & Denise Passmore, 2013. "Sexual risk factors for partner age discordance in adolescent girls and their male partners," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(23-24), pages 3289-3299, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:23-24:p:3289-3299
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12408
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew L. Owen, 2022. "The Fracking Boom, Labor Structure, and Adolescent Fertility," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(5), pages 2211-2231, October.
    2. Nathalie Moreau & András Költő & Honor Young & Florence Maillochon & Emmanuelle Godeau, 2019. "Negative feelings about the timing of first sexual intercourse: findings from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(2), pages 219-227, March.
    3. Finigan-Carr, Nadine M. & Craddock, Jaih B. & Johnson, Tonya, 2021. "Predictors of condom use among system-involved youth: The importance of Sex Ed," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:23-24:p:3289-3299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.