IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i23-24p3249-3258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group psychotherapy in women with a history of sexual abuse: what did they find helpful?

Author

Listed:
  • Aslıhan Sayın
  • Selçuk Candansayar
  • Leyla Welkin

Abstract

Aims and objectives To define the effects of group psychotherapy in women with a history of sexual abuse, to find possible predictors for dropout and treatment outcome rates and to find which therapeutic factors of group psychotherapy are perceived by group members to be most helpful. Background Sexual abuse of women is a global concern and causes many psychiatric and psychological sequelae. Group psychotherapy is one of the preferred treatment modalities. Design Prospective cohort study. Methods Forty‐seven women with a history of childhood and/or adulthood sexual abuse were recruited for weekly 12‐session group psychotherapy. Subjects were given the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, the Clinician Administered Post‐traumatic Stress Disorder Scale, the Dissociative Experiences Scale, the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire and the Group Therapeutic Factors Questionnaire. Re‐evaluations were made after the 6th and 12th session and also at a six‐month follow‐up session. Results Group psychotherapy significantly reduced participants' levels of depression (screening/12th session mean scores, 22·45/11·10), anxiety (15·45/4·32) and symptoms of post‐traumatic stress disorder (42·27/9·32), and this decline became statistically significant at the 6th session and tended to persist at the six‐month follow‐up. Higher levels of dissociative symptoms at baseline were associated with less response to treatment, but higher levels of attendance at group sessions. Group members rated existential factors (41·40 ± 12·39), cohesiveness (37·42 ± 8·32) and universalism (37·56 ± 7·11) as the most helpful therapeutic factors. Conclusion Group psychotherapy was significantly effective in reducing levels of depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in this sample of women. Dissociation had a significant effect on both treatment outcome and treatment adherence. For this sample of women, group psychotherapy was most helpful for reducing feelings of stigma, isolation and shame. Relevance to clinical practice Group psychotherapy can be used as a preferred treatment method for women from different cultural backgrounds with a history of sexual abuse.

Suggested Citation

  • Aslıhan Sayın & Selçuk Candansayar & Leyla Welkin, 2013. "Group psychotherapy in women with a history of sexual abuse: what did they find helpful?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(23-24), pages 3249-3258, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:23-24:p:3249-3258
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12168
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sikkema, Kathleen J. & Choi, Karmel W. & Robertson, Corne & Knettel, Brandon A. & Ciya, Nonceba & Knippler, Elizabeth T. & Watt, Melissa H. & Joska, John A., 2018. "Development of a coping intervention to improve traumatic stress and HIV care engagement among South African women with sexual trauma histories," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 148-156.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:23-24:p:3249-3258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.