IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i11-12p1707-1716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using the NHS sustainability framework to understand the activities and resource implications of Canadian nursing guideline early adopters

Author

Listed:
  • Kathryn Smith Higuchi
  • Angela Downey
  • Barbara Davies
  • Irmajean Bajnok
  • Melissa Waggott

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To examine the activities and resource implications for the initial cohort of healthcare organisations involved in the introduction of multiple nursing guidelines. Background. The Best Practice Spotlight Organization initiative was launched in 2003 as part of the Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario’s Best Practice Guidelines programme. While previous research has evaluated improvements in patient care and outcomes, there has been limited research from an organisational perspective on the activities conducted to introduce nursing guidelines. Design. Secondary analysis of retrospective narrative data. Methods. We conducted a content analysis of the 2004–2006 annual reports from the seven participating sites. We used both deductive and inductive approaches to categorise the guideline implementation activities and their resource implications. Results. All sites reported implementing multiple guidelines (four to nine guidelines per site) and used a wide range of implementation activities that clearly addressed nine of the 10 NHS Sustainability dimensions. The dimension not reported was benefits beyond helping patients. All sites established steering committees that involved staff and senior leaders, reviewed selected guidelines and recommendations, reviewed existing policies and procedures and developed new policies and procedures, recruited champions or peer mentors, applied for additional external funding to support activities, developed relationships with external clinical partners, included guideline implementation in orientation, developed intra‐agency web‐based and print communications for the project, and evaluated practice changes. For each of these activities, the sites reported expenditures and resource usage. Conclusions. The organisational processes used for the introduction of new nursing guidelines in Canada are remarkably consistent with factors identified by leaders and change agents in the UK who developed the NHS Sustainability Model. Relevance to clinical practice. A multidimensional framework for sustainability is useful for planning successful guideline implementation across an organisation. Examples of specific activities and resource implications for organisational change are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathryn Smith Higuchi & Angela Downey & Barbara Davies & Irmajean Bajnok & Melissa Waggott, 2013. "Using the NHS sustainability framework to understand the activities and resource implications of Canadian nursing guideline early adopters," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(11-12), pages 1707-1716, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:11-12:p:1707-1716
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04193.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04193.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04193.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kathryn S Higuchi & Barbara Davies & Jenny Ploeg, 2017. "Sustaining guideline implementation: A multisite perspective on activities, challenges and supports," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4413-4424, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:11-12:p:1707-1716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.