IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i3-4p517-526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beginning an action research project to investigate the feasibility of a midwife‐led normal birthing unit in China

Author

Listed:
  • Rosemary Mander
  • Ngai Fen Cheung
  • Xiaoli Wang
  • Wei Fu
  • Junghong Zhu

Abstract

Aim. To explore issues arising during preliminary stages of a research project in order to consider the feasibility of a midwife‐led normal birthing unit in mainland China. Background. Midwife‐led normal birthing units, as a route to ensuring normality, have become a feature of western maternity care, but are unknown in China. Design. Action research, using a qualitative descriptive approach, was performed. Data were collected at meetings, by non‐participant observation and by face‐to‐face semi‐structured interviews. Observation was undertaken in the midwife‐led normal birthing unit and a standard care setting. Data analysis was by thematic analysis using constant comparison techniques. Methods. In the labour ward of a large general hospital in a major city, stakeholders included midwifery staff, managers, university staff and researchers. Childbearing women proved keen to use this service, but were unable to participate in the planning. The midwife‐led normal birthing unit sought to provide one‐to‐one care in labour and support by a birth companion. Routine interventions were to be avoided. Results. The midwives in the midwife‐led normal birthing unit created a more suitable environment for supportive care. The midwives demonstrated high‐quality communication skills. The woman’s choice of position/mobility was limited. Difficulties with staffing were identified. Conclusions. The preliminary findings suggest that continuation of the project is feasible. The woman’s role demonstrates passivity. The perception of staff shortage has serious implications. Relevance to clinical practice. This action research project suggests that a study of a midwife‐led normal birthing unit in China is feasible, with some attention to staffing issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosemary Mander & Ngai Fen Cheung & Xiaoli Wang & Wei Fu & Junghong Zhu, 2010. "Beginning an action research project to investigate the feasibility of a midwife‐led normal birthing unit in China," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3‐4), pages 517-526, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:3-4:p:517-526
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02849.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02849.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02849.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McCourt, Christine, 2006. "Supporting choice and control? Communication and interaction between midwives and women at the antenatal booking visit," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 1307-1318, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Madeleine Aannestad & Marit Herstad & Elisabeth Severinsson, 2020. "A meta‐ethnographic synthesis of qualitative research on women's experience of midwifery care," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(2), pages 171-183, June.
    2. Bente Dahl & Kristiina Heinonen & Terese Elisabet Bondas, 2020. "From Midwife-Dominated to Midwifery-Led Antenatal Care: A Meta-Ethnography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Purva Abhyankar & Barbara A. Summers & Galina Velikova & Hilary L. Bekker, 2014. "Framing Options as Choice or Opportunity," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 34(5), pages 567-582, July.
    4. Finlay, Susanna & Sandall, Jane, 2009. ""Someone's rooting for you": Continuity, advocacy and street-level bureaucracy in UK maternal healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1228-1235, October.
    5. Kristiina Heinonen, 2021. "Strengthening Antenatal Care towards a Salutogenic Approach: A Meta-Ethnography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-28, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:3-4:p:517-526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.