IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i9p1132-1139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community dwelling adults’ perception of interpersonal trust vs. trust in health care providers

Author

Listed:
  • Judith E. Hupcey
  • Jamie Miller

Abstract

Aims. This study investigated community dwelling adults’ definition of trust in health care providers vs. interpersonal trust, description of the attributes of a trustworthy provider, factors that influenced the development and loss of trust. Background. Trust is an important part of health care relationships, however, the meaning of trust for patients is not well understood. Health care providers need to understand the meaning of trust in order to build and maintain therapeutic relationships with their patients. Design. A descriptive qualitative research design was used to investigate perceptions of trust. Methods. Semi‐structured open‐ended interviews were carried out with 32 community dwelling adults. The participants were recruited from church groups, senior health programs and other community programs. The interviews were thematically analysed for: definitions of interpersonal trust vs. trust in a health care provider, attributes of a trustworthy provider and factors that were pivotal in the development and loss of trust in a health care provider. Results. Trust in health care providers differed from interpersonal trust in the role‐specific attributes of the individuals. Trust, although influenced by having confidence in the provider's competence, was strongly tied to the interpersonal caring attributes of the provider. Loss of trust, on the other hand, was more closely allied with the issues of competency. Conclusions. Perceptions of trust varied greatly among this sample, reinforcing the significance of tailoring our approach to patients on an individual basis. Relevance to clinical practice. Assuming that we will be trusted based on our role as nurses may not facilitate the development of a therapeutic relationship with some patients. Nurses and other health care providers need to be acutely aware of our patient's trust and clues of pending loss of trust because, as this study and other prior studies have shown, once trust in a provider is lost, it is nearly impossible to rebuild.

Suggested Citation

  • Judith E. Hupcey & Jamie Miller, 2006. "Community dwelling adults’ perception of interpersonal trust vs. trust in health care providers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(9), pages 1132-1139, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:9:p:1132-1139
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01386.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01386.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01386.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hussain, Shahzeb & Melewar, T.C. & Priporas, Constantinos-Vasilios & Foroudi, Pantea & Dennis, Charles, 2020. "Examining the effects of celebrity trust on advertising credibility, brand credibility and corporate credibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 472-488.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:9:p:1132-1139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.