IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jnlmpe/v2023y2023i1n9068958.html

Electrical Fire Dynamic Risk Assessment for High‐Rise Buildings Based on Variable Fuzzy Set Theory and Bayesian Network

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Su
  • Chongwen Wei
  • Fan Yang
  • Lei Zhang
  • Yu Shen
  • Fan Zhang
  • Zhichun Yang

Abstract

High‐rise buildings fires are far more harmful than ordinary fires. In this regard, fire risk assessment is an important way to control fire risk and reduce losses. This study presents a comprehensive model to electrical fire dynamic risk assessment of high‐rise buildings based on a Bayesian network (BN) and a variable fuzzy set theory (VFST). Firstly, electric system, safety management, and other factors were comprehensively analyzed based on three categories: hazard sources identification (HSI), fault tree (FT) analysis, and VFST. A high‐rise building electrical fire dynamic risk assessment model was established based on a BN. Secondly, the prior probability of BN root nodes was determined by VFST, and the conditional probability table (CPT) was determined by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and decomposition method. On that basis, the quantitative inference and sensitivity analysis can be performed on the electrical fire risks of high‐rise buildings in combination with the variable fuzzy Bayesian network (VFBN) inference. Finally, a high‐rise building in Wuhan, China, was used as an example for verification. The results show that the proposed method can realize dynamic risk assessment of electrical fires in high‐rise buildings. This study provides a new method for fire risk assessment of high‐rise buildings to reduce the possibility of fire.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Su & Chongwen Wei & Fan Yang & Lei Zhang & Yu Shen & Fan Zhang & Zhichun Yang, 2023. "Electrical Fire Dynamic Risk Assessment for High‐Rise Buildings Based on Variable Fuzzy Set Theory and Bayesian Network," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2023(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jnlmpe:v:2023:y:2023:i:1:n:9068958
    DOI: 10.1155/2023/9068958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9068958
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2023/9068958?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guohua Zhang & Chengtang Wang & Yuyong Jiao & Hao Wang & Weimin Qin & Wu Chen & Guoqiang Zhong, 2020. "Collapse Risk Analysis of Deep Foundation Pits in Metro Stations Using a Fuzzy Bayesian Network and a Fuzzy AHP," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fu, Lipeng & Wang, Xueqing & Zhao, Heng & Li, Mengnan, 2022. "Interactions among safety risks in metro deep foundation pit projects: An association rule mining-based modeling framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    2. Chen, Yun & Wang, Jie & Jin, Lianghai & Nie, Benwu & Zheng, Xiazhong, 2024. "A hybrid approach integrating case mining (CM) and the Copula Bayesian Network (CBN) for accident causation probabilistic reasoning of building construction collapses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    3. Cebi, Selcuk & Karakurt, Necip Fazıl & Kurtulus, Erkan & Tokgoz, Bunyamin, 2024. "Development of a decision support system for client acceptance in independent audit process," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    4. Changjian Chen & Wei Zou & Ping Geng & Wenqi Gu & Feiyun Yuan & Chuan He, 2023. "Study on Seismic Damage Risk Assessment of Mountain Tunnel Based on the Extension Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jnlmpe:v:2023:y:2023:i:1:n:9068958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/2629 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.