IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jnlmpe/v2023y2023i1n1348624.html

Application of Improved Monarch Butterfly Optimization for Parameters’ Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Shixin Huang
  • Kedao Zhang
  • Hongmei Li
  • Xiangjian Chen

Abstract

The reasonable selection of cutting parameters in the machining process is of great significance to improve productivity, reduce production costs, and improve the quality of parts. However, due to the complexity of cutting parameter model optimization, most factories currently use experience or refer to relevant manuals to select the value of cutting parameters in production. In order to avoid and minimize abnormalities, they usually select more experienced and conservative values, and often do not select reasonable cutting parameters, which is not conducive to improving productivity, reducing production costs, and improving the quality of parts. Therefore, the research on cutting parameter optimization has important theoretical value and application value. In this paper, in order to find the optimal cutting parameters, the cutting model is solved by the improved monarch butterfly optimization (IMBO) algorithm, and the optimized cutting parameters are obtained. By establishing the mathematical model of cutting, the constraint conditions of actual machining are introduced into the model. In order to solve the model, some ideas of particle swarm optimization (PSO) and differential evolution (DE) are added to the traditional monarch butterfly optimization (MBO) algorithm. The MBO algorithm is improved to deal with multiobjective optimization problems. The IMBO algorithm is used to optimize the cutting model. The experiment shows that the optimized cutting parameters can significantly reduce production cost and maintain high production efficiency. Compared with NSGA‐II algorithm and other swarm intelligence optimization algorithms, it shows that the IMBO algorithm has certain advantages in multiobjective optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Shixin Huang & Kedao Zhang & Hongmei Li & Xiangjian Chen, 2023. "Application of Improved Monarch Butterfly Optimization for Parameters’ Optimization," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2023(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jnlmpe:v:2023:y:2023:i:1:n:1348624
    DOI: 10.1155/2023/1348624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1348624
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2023/1348624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Longhua Xu & Chuanzhen Huang & Chengwu Li & Jun Wang & Hanlian Liu & Xiaodan Wang, 2021. "An improved case based reasoning method and its application in estimation of surface quality toward intelligent machining," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 313-327, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeong Hoon Ko & Chen Yin, 2026. "A review of artificial intelligence application for machining surface quality prediction: from key factors to model development," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 775-798, February.
    2. Zehua Wang & Sibao Wang & Shilong Wang & Zengya Zhao & Zhifeng Tian, 2025. "An intelligent prediction method of surface residual stresses based on multi-source heterogeneous data," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 441-457, January.
    3. Mengqi He & Xiuxu Zhao & Fan He & Emmanuel Appiah & Jiao Li & Chenghui Zhu, 2024. "A modified RBF-CBR model considering evaluation index for gear grinding process with worm grinding wheel decision support system," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 2367-2386, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jnlmpe:v:2023:y:2023:i:1:n:1348624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/2629 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.