IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v35y2024i5d10.1007_s10845-023-02148-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A modified RBF-CBR model considering evaluation index for gear grinding process with worm grinding wheel decision support system

Author

Listed:
  • Mengqi He

    (Wuhan University of Technology
    Wuhan University of Technology)

  • Xiuxu Zhao

    (Wuhan University of Technology
    Wuhan University of Technology)

  • Fan He

    (Wuhan University of Technology
    Wuhan University of Technology)

  • Emmanuel Appiah

    (Wuhan University of Technology
    Wuhan University of Technology)

  • Jiao Li

    (Shaoneng Group Shaoguan Hongda Gear Co)

  • Chenghui Zhu

    (Shaoneng Group Shaoguan Hongda Gear Co)

Abstract

The grinding process of transmission gear with worm grinding wheel usually relies on the manual parameter setting by experienced engineers, but the reliability and validity are quite hard to control due to many grinding factors that affect the surface quality (e.g. structure, size, and materials of gear, heat treatment process, surface accuracy requirements). Therefore, it is necessary to set up a decision system for assisting engineers with designing the process plan efficiently and reasonably. A modified model of the revision method based on the radial basis function (RBF) neural network and case-based reasoning (CBR) considering evaluation index was proposed in this paper. A similar case retrieval mainly relies on the soft likelihood function considering a compound evaluation index model, where the score value of each new case execution test is converted into the corresponding index to achieve effective case storage. Process solutions for similar cases that perform better will be recommended from the case database by means of CBR. These candidates can be revised systematically based on a self-learning model. A modified RBF neural network trained by the existing cases will apply the learned experience to revise solution in part or in whole, which utilizes a self-filtering attribute method based on the correlation coefficient matrix so as to gain the primary attributes. In the case of the grinding gear with worm grinding wheel, the applicability of this technology was demonstrated. A decision-making system applying this method was developed by using.Net framework4.0 and SQL Server. Consequently, the technique can quickly generate a feasible process plan for specific gear.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengqi He & Xiuxu Zhao & Fan He & Emmanuel Appiah & Jiao Li & Chenghui Zhu, 2024. "A modified RBF-CBR model considering evaluation index for gear grinding process with worm grinding wheel decision support system," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 2367-2386, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:35:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s10845-023-02148-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-023-02148-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-023-02148-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-023-02148-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Longhua Xu & Chuanzhen Huang & Chengwu Li & Jun Wang & Hanlian Liu & Xiaodan Wang, 2021. "An improved case based reasoning method and its application in estimation of surface quality toward intelligent machining," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 313-327, January.
    2. Shengqiang Li & Hua Zhang & Wei Yan & Zhigang Jiang, 2021. "A hybrid method of blockchain and case-based reasoning for remanufacturing process planning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 1389-1399, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wishal Naveed & Majsa Ammouriova & Noman Naveed & Angel A. Juan, 2022. "Circular Economy and Information Technologies: Identifying and Ranking the Factors of Successful Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Xiahui Liu & Liqun Zhang & Qianwang Deng & Meng Li & Chao Jiang, 2024. "Bilateral matching for collaborative remanufacturing services based on multi-attribute preferences and mutual interactions," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 1353-1372, March.
    3. Zehua Wang & Sibao Wang & Shilong Wang & Zengya Zhao & Zhifeng Tian, 2025. "An intelligent prediction method of surface residual stresses based on multi-source heterogeneous data," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 441-457, January.
    4. Yan Zhang & Wen Zhang & Xiao Shi & Ting Hou, 2024. "Competing refurbishment in a supply chain with different selling modes," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(6), pages 2845-2865, August.
    5. Yasanur Kayikci & Nazlican Gozacan‐Chase & Abderahman Rejeb & Kaliyan Mathiyazhagan, 2022. "Critical success factors for implementing blockchain‐based circular supply chain," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3595-3615, November.
    6. Houria Lahmar & Mohammed Dahane & Kinza Nadia Mouss & Mohammed Haoues, 2025. "Multi-objective sustainable production planning for a hybrid multi-stage manufacturing-remanufacturing system with grade-based classification of recovered and remanufactured products," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1385-1407, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:35:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s10845-023-02148-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.