IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jjmath/v2022y2022i1n2842601.html

Large‐Scale Group Decision‐Making Model with Cooperative Behavior Based on Social Network Analysis considering Propagation of Decision‐Makers’ Preference

Author

Listed:
  • Shizhen Bai
  • Hao He
  • Mengke Ge
  • Ruobing Yang
  • Dan Luo
  • Xinrui Bi

Abstract

This paper proposes a large‐scale group decision‐making model with cooperative behavior based on social network analysis considering propagation of decision‐makers’ preference, which is applicable for large‐scale group decision‐making problems in social network contexts. The main contributions of our research are three aspects. Firstly, a novel calculation method of cooperative degree, hesitant degree, and noncooperative degree is developed, which considers both the network status and the preference for each DM, and thereby it can better represent the current state for each DM. Then, the determination method of each DM’s weight is presented, which considers both the individual network centrality and preference similarity degree. In addition, the score for the current cooperation situation is performed, and the improvement algorithm of the increase of cooperative degree and the decrease of noncooperative degree is designed to enhance the quality of the decision‐making results. Finally, the proposed model has demonstrated the validity and superiority based on the comparative and sensitive analysis through a practical example.

Suggested Citation

  • Shizhen Bai & Hao He & Mengke Ge & Ruobing Yang & Dan Luo & Xinrui Bi, 2022. "Large‐Scale Group Decision‐Making Model with Cooperative Behavior Based on Social Network Analysis considering Propagation of Decision‐Makers’ Preference," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:2842601
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/2842601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2842601
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/2842601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuan Gao & Zhen Zhang, 2021. "Consensus reaching with non-cooperative behavior management for personalized individual semantics-based social network group decision making," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(11), pages 2518-2535, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shizhen Bai & Hao He & Dan Luo & Mengke Ge & Ruobing Yang & Xinrui Bi, 2022. "A Large‐Scale Group Decision‐Making Consensus Model considering the Experts’ Adjustment Willingness Based on the Interactive Weights’ Determination," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jamshid Afshani & Abbas Karimi & Nafiseh Osati Eraghi & Faraneh Zarafshan, 2022. "A Fuzzy DEMATEL‐ANP‐Based Approach to Prioritize Activities in Enterprise Architecture," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    2. Fang Xu & Mengfan Yan & Lun Wang & Shaojian Qu, 2022. "The Robust Emergency Medical Facilities Location-Allocation Models under Uncertain Environment: A Hybrid Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Shizhen Bai & Hao He & Dan Luo & Mengke Ge & Ruobing Yang & Xinrui Bi, 2022. "A Large‐Scale Group Decision‐Making Consensus Model considering the Experts’ Adjustment Willingness Based on the Interactive Weights’ Determination," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    4. Zhen Zhang & Zhuolin Li, 2023. "Consensus-based TOPSIS-Sort-B for multi-criteria sorting in the context of group decision-making," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 911-938, June.
    5. Jiang, Jing & Liu, Xinwang & Wang, Weizhong & Deveci, Muhammet, 2023. "Assessing the impact of healthcare service risks on healthcare demand under evolving economic and social structures: An improved GLDS decision making method considering risk attitudes," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 459-479.
    6. Aijia Ruan & Junjun Mao & Wei Xu & Tao Wu & Yufeng Zhang, 2026. "Dual-Domain Consensus Feedback Mechanism based Collaborative Similarity Index for Large-Scale Group Decision Making in Social Network," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 1-35, June.
    7. Iraj Mohammadfam & Ali Asghar Khajevandi & Hesam Dehghani & Mohammad Babamiri & Maryam Farhadian, 2022. "Analysis of Factors Affecting Human Reliability in the Mining Process Design Using Fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:2842601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1469 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.