IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jintdv/v25y2013i8p1129-1143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How The Extreme Poor Cope With Crises: Understanding The Role Of Assets And Consumption

Author

Listed:
  • David Lawson
  • Ibrahim Kasirye

Abstract

Abstract This paper uses quantitative and qualitative panel household data, for the period 1992–2009, to model the coping mechanisms of households when faced with crises in Uganda. We find that socio‐economic determinants strongly influence coping mechanisms, with larger sized households being more likely to engage in the reduction of assets, and with households more likely to reduce food consumption when there is a drought and sell assets when faced with floods. Furthermore, being persistently poor and sick appear to result in disproportionately large reductions in assets over time—depleting a households asset base, and future coping mechanisms, of poorer households. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • David Lawson & Ibrahim Kasirye, 2013. "How The Extreme Poor Cope With Crises: Understanding The Role Of Assets And Consumption," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(8), pages 1129-1143, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:25:y:2013:i:8:p:1129-1143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/jid.2968
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nilifer Anaç & Eva-Maria Egger & Sam Jones & Ricardo Santos & Alex Warren-Rodriguez, 2022. "The impact of COVID-19 on urban informal workers in Maputo," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2022-173, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Eva-Maria Egger & Vincenzo Salvucci & Finn Tarp, 2023. "Evolution of Multidimensional Poverty in Crisis-Ridden Mozambique," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 485-519, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:25:y:2013:i:8:p:1129-1143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.