IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jforec/v38y2019i5p375-389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The total cost of misclassification in credit scoring: A comparison of generalized linear models and generalized additive models

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Lohmann
  • Thorsten Ohliger

Abstract

This study examines whether the evaluation of a bankruptcy prediction model should take into account the total cost of misclassification. For this purpose, we introduce and apply a validity measure in credit scoring that is based on the total cost of misclassification. Specifically, we use comprehensive data from the annual financial statements of a sample of German companies and analyze the total cost of misclassification by comparing a generalized linear model and a generalized additive model with regard to their ability to predict a company's probability of default. On the basis of these data, the validity measure we introduce shows that, compared to generalized linear models, generalized additive models can reduce substantially the extent of misclassification and the total cost that this entails. The validity measure we introduce is informative and justifies the argument that generalized additive models should be preferred, although such models are more complex than generalized linear models. We conclude that to balance a model's validity and complexity, it is necessary to take into account the total cost of misclassification.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Lohmann & Thorsten Ohliger, 2019. "The total cost of misclassification in credit scoring: A comparison of generalized linear models and generalized additive models," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(5), pages 375-389, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:38:y:2019:i:5:p:375-389
    DOI: 10.1002/for.2545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2545
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/for.2545?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yufei Xia & Xinyi Guo & Yinguo Li & Lingyun He & Xueyuan Chen, 2022. "Deep learning meets decision trees: An application of a heterogeneous deep forest approach in credit scoring for online consumer lending," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(8), pages 1669-1690, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:38:y:2019:i:5:p:375-389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/2966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.