IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/isacfm/v3y1994i3p149-164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

APX: An Integrated Knowledge‐Based System to Support Audit Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Anandhi Bharadwaj
  • Vijay Karan
  • Radha K. Mahapatra
  • Uday S. Murthy
  • Ajay S. Vinze

Abstract

Auditors who must express an opinion on the financial statements of publicly held enterprises must perform a series of risk assessments as the basis for selecting appropriate audit procedures to be performed. Although many auditing expert systems have been developed for individual components of the audit risk assessment process such as inherent and control risk assessment, none integrate these assessments to arrive at the ultimate objective of assessing the allowable level of detection risk which drives audit procedure selection. This paper discusses critical design concerns for audit planning expert systems in light of the integrated nature of the steps involved in the audit planning process. The design and development of an integrated audit planning expert system called APX (Audit Planning eXpert) is also discussed. A distinguishing feature of APX is that it not only performs the individual types of risk assessments but it also integrates the resulting assessments to arrive at allowable detection risk. The knowledge acquisition and system development process are described to illustrate some of the mechanics of developing such a system.

Suggested Citation

  • Anandhi Bharadwaj & Vijay Karan & Radha K. Mahapatra & Uday S. Murthy & Ajay S. Vinze, 1994. "APX: An Integrated Knowledge‐Based System to Support Audit Planning," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(3), pages 149-164, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:3:y:1994:i:3:p:149-164
    DOI: 10.1002/j.1099-1174.1994.tb00063.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1099-1174.1994.tb00063.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/j.1099-1174.1994.tb00063.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeff Delisio & Maureen McGowan & Walter Hamscher, 1994. "PLANET: An Expert System for Audit Risk Assessment and Planning," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(1), pages 65-77, January.
    2. James M. Peters, 1992. "Knowledge Representation Issues in Complex Decision Domains: an Example from Inherent Audit Risk Assessment," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 1(1), pages 9-20, January.
    3. David Murphy & Carol E. Brown, 1992. "The Uses of Advanced Information Technology in Audit Planning," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 1(3), pages 187-193, September.
    4. Peters, Jm, 1990. "A Cognitive Computational Model Of Risk Hypothesis Generation," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28, pages 83-103.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amelia A. Baldwin & Carol E. Brown & Brad S. Trinkle, 2006. "Opportunities for artificial intelligence development in the accounting domain: the case for auditing," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(3), pages 77-86, July.
    2. Skerratt, L.C.L. & Woodhead, A., 1992. "Modelling audit risk," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 119-137.
    3. Ritchie, Bob & Khorwatt, Esamaddin, 2007. "The attitude of Libyan auditors to inherent control risk assessment," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 39-59.
    4. Peter Duchessi & Robert O'Keefe & Daniel O'Leary, 1993. "A Research Perspective: Artificial Intelligence, Management and Organizations," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(3), pages 151-159, August.
    5. Bryan K. Church & Arnold Schneider, 1993. "Auditors' Generation of Diagnostic Hypotheses in Response to a Superior's Suggestion: Interference Effects," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 333-350, September.
    6. Steven Salterio, 1994. "Researching for Accounting Precedents: Learning, Efficiency, and Effectiveness," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 515-542, June.
    7. James M. Peters, 1992. "Knowledge Representation Issues in Complex Decision Domains: an Example from Inherent Audit Risk Assessment," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 1(1), pages 9-20, January.
    8. Choo, Freddie, 1996. "Auditors' knowledge content and judgment performance: A cognitive script approach," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 339-359, May.
    9. D. Eric Hirst, 1994. "Auditor Sensitivity to Earnings Management," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 405-422, June.
    10. Jeff Delisio & Maureen McGowan & Walter Hamscher, 1994. "PLANET: An Expert System for Audit Risk Assessment and Planning," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(1), pages 65-77, January.
    11. Philip A Collier & Stewart A Leech & Nicole Clark, 1999. "A validated expert system for decision making in corporate recovery," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(2), pages 75-88, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:3:y:1994:i:3:p:149-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1099-1174/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.