IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/intssr/v62y2009i4p41-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sickness and disability benefit programmes: What is driving policy convergence?

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Prinz
  • William Tompson

Abstract

In this paper we explore the reasons for the apparent convergence in sickness and disability policies across the OECD, asking whether and to what extent policy convergence should be seen as a product of policy learning. We conclude that convergence is the result of policy imitation more than policy learning and that learning (from past mistakes) is more likely within countries than across borders. Given limited evidence on what really “works”, when it comes to designing policies that both provide adequate income security and still encourage labour‐force participation, governments look abroad or to bodies like the OECD for possible models and ideas to underlie a reform. However, translating those ideas into workable policies requires great sensitivity to the institutional and political‐economic context — especially the role of the social partners and the nature of policies in existence. When it comes to policy implementation, such contextual learning may be crucial.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Prinz & William Tompson, 2009. "Sickness and disability benefit programmes: What is driving policy convergence?," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(4), pages 41-61, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:62:y:2009:i:4:p:41-61
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-246X.2009.01345.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-246X.2009.01345.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-246X.2009.01345.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ágota Scharle & Balázs Váradi, 2013. "Identifying Barriers to Institutional Change in Disability Services. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 41," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47016, April.
    2. Mitchell Wiener & Himanshi Jain & Anita Schwarz & Miglena Abel, 2017. "Disability Pensions in the European Union," World Bank Publications - Reports 34038, The World Bank Group.
    3. René Böheim & Thomas Leoni, 2016. "Disability policies: Reform strategies in a comparative perspective," NBER Working Papers 22206, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. van Sonsbeek, Jan-Maarten & Alblas, Ridwan, 2012. "Disability benefit microsimulation models in the Netherlands," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 700-715.
    5. Richard Burkhauser & Mary Daly & Duncan McVicar & Roger Wilkins, 2014. "Disability benefit growth and disability reform in the US: lessons from other OECD nations," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 3(1), pages 1-30, December.
    6. Ágota Scharle & Balázs Váradi & Flóra Samu, 2015. "Policy Convergence Across Welfare Regimes: The Case of Disability Policies. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 76," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 50914, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:62:y:2009:i:4:p:41-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1865-1674 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.