IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ijfiec/v21y2016i4p417-446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Domestic Investor Protection on Foreign Investment Decisions: Evidence from Bond Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Elina Pradkhan

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between domestic creditor protection and foreign investment decisions in bond markets. It also investigates how the difference between domestic and foreign creditor protections affects the foreign investment. The impact of domestic creditor protection on cross‐border investment in bonds is twofold. A high level of domestic creditor protection increases international diversification. At the same time, an efficient protection of creditor rights at home reduces the sensitivity of foreign investment to foreign creditor protection. These results hold most strongly for investing countries with high levels of domestic creditor protection. In addition, this study shows that the difference between domestic and foreign creditor protections matters for investment decisions: if domestic creditor protection is more efficient than foreign creditor protection, the sensitivity of foreign investment to foreign (domestic) creditor protection decreases (increases). Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Elina Pradkhan, 2016. "Impact of Domestic Investor Protection on Foreign Investment Decisions: Evidence from Bond Markets," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(4), pages 417-446, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:21:y:2016:i:4:p:417-446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Park, Donghyun & Taniguchi, Kiyoshi & Tian, Shu, 2019. "Determinants of foreign and domestic investment bias in global bond markets: Some empirical evidence," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 287-303.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:21:y:2016:i:4:p:417-446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1076-9307/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.