IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v79y2025ics0275531925003204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhanced judicial independence and bond credit spreads: Evidence from the establishment of circuit courts

Author

Listed:
  • Lv, Dayong
  • Ye, Qi
  • Jiang, Yan
  • Wei, Xiaokun

Abstract

Using a large sample of bonds issued by Chinese listed firms from 2010 to 2021, we explore the relationship between judicial independence as improved by Circuit Courts (CCs) and bond credit spreads (BCS). We find that bond issuers covered by CCs experience a decrease in BCS compared to those uncovered. This result remains unchanged under various checks, including a propensity score matching method, entropy balance method, difference-in-differences framework, alternative sample, and other robust tests. In addition, this favorable effect of improved judicial independence is greater for issuers with greater default risks or liquidity risks, consistent with the “perceived lower recovery risk story” and “perceived lower liquidity risk story.” Finally, this effect is stronger for bond issuers operating in regions with poor legal environments, higher levels of local protectionism, or stronger government interventions. Our paper stresses the important role of the judiciary in decreasing debt financing costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Lv, Dayong & Ye, Qi & Jiang, Yan & Wei, Xiaokun, 2025. "Enhanced judicial independence and bond credit spreads: Evidence from the establishment of circuit courts," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:79:y:2025:i:c:s0275531925003204
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925003204
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:79:y:2025:i:c:s0275531925003204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.