IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/idsxxx/v44y2013i3p57-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Achieving Universal Salt Iodisation (USI) in Pakistan: Challenges, Experiences and the Way Forward

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed K. Masuood
  • Tausif Akhtar Janjua

Abstract

This article aims to describe the history, progress, success and challenges of the Universal Salt Iodisation (USI) programme in Pakistan, which was launched in 1994. Revitalised in 2005 with financial assistance and technical, operational, logistic and commodity support from the Micronutrient Initiative (MI), it is now being implemented in 102 districts of Pakistan. With an increase in household utilisation of iodised salt from 17 per cent in 2001 to 69 per cent in 2011, severe iodine deficiency among women and school‐aged children has decreased to 3 per cent and 2 per cent respectively. Strong government ownership and commitment, coupled with effective monitoring and supervision, have been the driving force of the USI Pakistan programme. These, combined with quality control measures, stringent regulatory and enforcement mechanisms, availability of fortificants in the open market and demand generation are the necessary requirements for programme sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed K. Masuood & Tausif Akhtar Janjua, 2013. "Achieving Universal Salt Iodisation (USI) in Pakistan: Challenges, Experiences and the Way Forward," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(3), pages 57-65, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:idsxxx:v:44:y:2013:i:3:p:57-65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/idsb.2013.44.issue-3
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saha, Amrita & Guariso, Daniele & Mbuya, Mduduzi N.N. & Ebata, Ayako, 2021. "Firm’s compliance behaviour towards food fortification regulations: Evidence from oil and salt producers in Bangladesh," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:idsxxx:v:44:y:2013:i:3:p:57-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0265-5012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.