IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/idsxxx/v42y2011i4p90-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Politics of Seed Relief in Zimbabwe

Author

Listed:
  • Charity Mutonodzo‐Davies
  • Douglas Magunda

Abstract

A decade of economic and political turmoil in Zimbabwe, as well as a period of radical land reform which reconfigured the country's agricultural sector, dramatically affected its seed system, reducing the supply of quality seeds and undermining regulatory control. The collapse of the seed system was exacerbated by seed relief programmes implemented by the government and aid agencies, which bypassed the normal market chain. In 2010, aid agencies experimented with ‘market‐friendly’ input programmes which also created distortions and were vulnerable to political interference. In resource‐constrained settings, subsidy programmes, no matter what design, became objects of political contestation. This article aims to understand how Zimbabwe can rebuild a seed system appropriate to the post‐land reform context by asking questions about the underlying political economy of this process, examining the implementation of the input delivery approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Charity Mutonodzo‐Davies & Douglas Magunda, 2011. "The Politics of Seed Relief in Zimbabwe," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(4), pages 90-101, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:idsxxx:v:42:y:2011:i:4:p:90-101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/idsb.2011.42.issue-4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jason Donovan & Pieter Rutsaert & Ciro Domínguez & Meliza Peña, 2022. "Capacities of local maize seed enterprises in Mexico: Implications for seed systems development," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(2), pages 509-529, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:idsxxx:v:42:y:2011:i:4:p:90-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0265-5012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.