IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v29y2020i9p1086-1097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated care models and behavioral health care utilization: Quasi‐experimental evidence from Medicaid health homes

Author

Listed:
  • Chandler McClellan
  • Johanna Catherine Maclean
  • Brendan Saloner
  • Emma E. McGinty
  • Michael F. Pesko

Abstract

Integration of behavioral and general medical care can improve outcomes for individuals with behavioral health conditions—serious mental illness (SMI) and substance use disorder (SUD). However, behavioral health care has historically been segregated from general medical care in many countries. We provide the first population‐level evidence on the effects of Medicaid health homes (HH) on behavioral health care service use. Medicaid, a public insurance program in the United States, HHs were created under the 2010 Affordable Care Act to coordinate behavioral and general medical care for enrollees with behavioral health conditions. As of 2016, 16 states had adopted an HH for enrollees with SMI and/or SUD. We use data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health over the period 2010 to 2016 coupled with a two‐way fixed‐effects model to estimate HH effects on behavioral health care utilization. We find that HH adoption increases service use among enrollees, although mental health care treatment findings are sensitive to specification. Further, enrollee self‐reported health improves post‐HH.

Suggested Citation

  • Chandler McClellan & Johanna Catherine Maclean & Brendan Saloner & Emma E. McGinty & Michael F. Pesko, 2020. "Integrated care models and behavioral health care utilization: Quasi‐experimental evidence from Medicaid health homes," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(9), pages 1086-1097, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:29:y:2020:i:9:p:1086-1097
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.4027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4027
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.4027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:29:y:2020:i:9:p:1086-1097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.