IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i4p617-d1635263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balancing Privacy, Trust, and Equity: Patient Perspectives on Substance Use Disorder Data Sharing

Author

Listed:
  • Mengyi Wei

    (College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA)

  • Michael Todd

    (Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA)

  • Aimee N. C. Campbell

    (Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA)

  • Darwyn Chern

    (Copa Health, Mesa, AZ 85205, USA)

  • Eric Lott

    (Community Bridges, Phoenix, AZ 85034, USA)

  • Mary J. Whitfield

    (Jewish Family and Children’s Services, Phoenix, AZ 85037, USA)

  • Nick Stavros

    (Community Medical Services, Phoenix, AZ 85021, USA)

  • Elise Greenberg

    (Copa Health, Mesa, AZ 85205, USA)

  • Adela Grando

    (College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA)

Abstract

Background: Sharing substance use disorder (SUD) data is essential for advancing equitable healthcare and improving outcomes for marginalized populations. However, concerns about privacy, stigma, and adherence to data privacy regulations often hinder effective data sharing. This study explores patient preferences and considerations related to sharing SUD-related medical records, with a focus on the sociocultural and systemic factors that shape their willingness to share. Methods: A total of 357 adult patients from four community-based clinics in Arizona participated in a cross-sectional electronic survey. The survey assessed sociodemographic factors, experiences of stigma (self-directed, anticipated, and provider-based), trust in healthcare providers, satisfaction with care, and willingness to share SUD data across various scenarios. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and one-way ANOVA to uncover key associations. Results: Patients identified SUD history, diagnoses, and treatment information as particularly sensitive. Stigma was significantly correlated with increased sensitivity and reduced willingness to share data, especially with providers outside their primary facility ( p < 0.001). In contrast, trust in providers and higher satisfaction with care were linked to greater willingness to share data with all providers ( p < 0.01). Patients were more inclined to share SUD data during emergencies or for direct treatment purposes than for administrative or research applications ( p < 0.001). Discussion: These findings underscore the ethical imperative to address stigma and foster trust to promote equitable SUD data sharing. Policies must empower patients with control over sensitive health information while ensuring cultural competence and fairness in care delivery. Ensuring that patients feel confident in how their data are used may encourage greater participation in health information exchange, ultimately supporting more effective and individualized SUD care.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengyi Wei & Michael Todd & Aimee N. C. Campbell & Darwyn Chern & Eric Lott & Mary J. Whitfield & Nick Stavros & Elise Greenberg & Adela Grando, 2025. "Balancing Privacy, Trust, and Equity: Patient Perspectives on Substance Use Disorder Data Sharing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:617-:d:1635263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/4/617/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/4/617/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:617-:d:1635263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.