IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v16y2026i1p90-99.html

Experimental Assessment of CO2–Water Relative Permeability in the Tight Brenha Limestone Formation, Lusitanian Basin, Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Clive E. Besua
  • Gustavo Paneiro
  • Hugo Matias

Abstract

Accurate relative permeability data are essential for evaluating the performance of geological reservoirs. Characterizing multiphase flow in these geological reservoirs, particularly in low‐permeability formations (with an average permeability of 0.165 mD), such as the Brenha limestone, where capillary effects are significant, requires an analytical technique that can capture the dynamic interactions between capillary forces and saturation profiles. This study presents experimental measurements of CO2–water relative permeability in tight limestone samples from the Brenha Formation, addressing critical parameters for the feasibility assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS). Unsteady‐state core flooding experiments were performed using these rock samples under reservoir conditions at a constant flow rate to determine multiphase flow properties. These multiphase flow properties values were calculated using the Ramakrishnan–Cappiello method, which accurately captures the realistic flow behavior of heterogeneous core samples, particularly where capillary pressure dominates viscous forces, resulting in a more accurate residual fluid saturation compared to conventional unsteady‐state methods. Results indicate that the Brenha Limestone exhibits typical limestone relative permeability behavior, with CO2 breakthrough occurring at water saturations ranging from 0.25 to 0.82. The CO2 relative permeability ranges from 0.021 to 0.876, whereas the water relative permeability varies from 0.014 to 0.672 across the saturation range. Significant hysteresis effects were observed, with a 5%–16% reduction in relative permeability between imbibition and drainage cycles. The tight nature of the Brenha Formation limestone from Barreiro 3 well with average permeability of 0.165 mD, significantly influences multiphase flow characteristics, necessitating the use of specialized experimental and analytical techniques. These findings provide critical input parameters for assessing CO2 storage capacity, optimizing injection strategies, and assessing containment integrity in the Brenha Limestone formation.

Suggested Citation

  • Clive E. Besua & Gustavo Paneiro & Hugo Matias, 2026. "Experimental Assessment of CO2–Water Relative Permeability in the Tight Brenha Limestone Formation, Lusitanian Basin, Portugal," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 16(1), pages 90-99, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:16:y:2026:i:1:p:90-99
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2386
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.2386?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:16:y:2026:i:1:p:90-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.