IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v15y2025i2p102-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Direct Measurement of Greenhouse Gas Emission Rates From Manure Management in Different Livestock Production Systems in Cameroon

Author

Listed:
  • Ngwa Martin Ngwabie
  • Juliette N. Kwe
  • Sandrine Y. Mitin
  • Nancy F. Ngong

Abstract

Direct measurements of greenhouse gas emissions from the increasingly intensified African livestock production are important to assess locally available mitigation strategies. As such, measurements were conducted from March to June using static flux chambers to quantify the emission rates of CH4, N2O, and CO2 from manure in poultry and pig production systems in Cameroon. Emissions were measured from two layer barns, two pig facilities, six broiler farms, and one farm with Brahman birds. Mean emission factors inside two layer barns were 0.06–0.21 and 602–958 mg animal−1 h−1 for CH4 and CO2, respectively, and 21–112 µg animal−1 h−1 for N2O. Mean emission factors inside four broiler barns with wood shavings as bedding material were 0.31–1.22 and 355–1884 mg animal−1 h−1 for CH4 and CO2, respectively, and 2.33–1052 µg animal−1 h−1 for N2O. Broiler N2O emissions were 971.38 ± 250.23 and 26.14 ± 30.27 µg animal−1 h−1 from manure underneath a meshed floor barn and a shelter with bare soil, respectively. Emissions from a storage tank with wastewater from a piggery were 8.30 ± 7.36 and 40.41 ± 5.54 mg m−2 min−1 for CH4 and CO2, respectively, and 2.80 ± 1.67 µg m−2 min−1 for N2O. Mean emissions from two outdoor storages of a mixture of poultry and pig manure were 0.76–0.9 and 69–136 mg m−2 min−1 for CH4 and CO2, respectively, and 10–15 µg m−2 min−1 for N2O. Emissions depended highly on manure production and management systems. CH4 emissions were lower from poultry compared to pig manure. Younger layers emitted higher CH4 compared to older layer hens. CH4 emissions were higher from slurry compared to solid manure, whereas N2O emissions were higher from solid compared to slurry manure storages. These findings indicate that mitigation strategies for greenhouse gas emissions should depend not only on the type of gases and manure management systems but also on the animal types and their ages.

Suggested Citation

  • Ngwa Martin Ngwabie & Juliette N. Kwe & Sandrine Y. Mitin & Nancy F. Ngong, 2025. "Direct Measurement of Greenhouse Gas Emission Rates From Manure Management in Different Livestock Production Systems in Cameroon," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 15(2), pages 102-110, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:102-110
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2326
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.2326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goopy, J.P. & Onyango, A.A. & Dickhoefer, U. & Butterbach-Bahl, K., 2018. "A new approach for improving emission factors for enteric methane emissions of cattle in smallholder systems of East Africa – Results for Nyando, Western Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 72-80.
    2. Marcello Ermido Chiodini & Michele Costantini & Michele Zoli & Jacopo Bacenetti & Daniele Aspesi & Lorenzo Poggianella & Marco Acutis, 2023. "Real-Scale Study on Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emission Reduction from Dairy Liquid Manure with the Commercial Additive SOP LAGOON," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Graham, Michael W. & Chelanga, Philemon & Jensen, Nathaniel D. & Leitner, Sonja M. & Fava, Francesco & Merbold, Lutz, 2021. "A framework for assessing the effects of shock events on livestock and environment in sub-Saharan Africa: The COVID-19 pandemic in Northern Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. Graham, Michael W. & Özkan, Şeyda & Arndt, Claudia & González-Quintero, Ricardo & Korir, Daniel & Merbold, Lutz & Mottet, Anne & Ndung'u, Phyllis W. & Notenbaert, An & Leitner, Sonja M., 2024. "Toward compatibility with national dairy production and climate goals through locally appropriate mitigation interventions in Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    3. Ramírez-Restrepo, Carlos A. & Vera-Infanzón, Raul R. & Rao, Idupulapati M., 2020. "Predicting methane emissions, animal-environmental metrics and carbon footprint from Brahman (Bos indicus) breeding herd systems based on long-term research on grazing of neotropical savanna and Brach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:102-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.