IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fistud/v46y2025i2p239-259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will childcare subsidies increase the labour supply of mothers in Ireland?

Author

Listed:
  • Karina Doorley
  • Dora Tuda
  • Luke Duggan

Abstract

We study the effect of the largest childcare subsidy scheme in Ireland, a country where, historically, mothers provided childcare and did not participate on the labour market. In 2019, the cost of full‐time centre‐based childcare was among the most expensive in the OECD. At the end of 2019, a means‐tested childcare subsidy was introduced to improve childcare affordability, but nothing is known of the maternal labour supply effects. We model the joint decision of labour supply and childcare for lone and coupled mothers of children under six. Mothers are likely to respond to the introduction of childcare subsidies in 2019 by switching from informal childcare to formal childcare (12 percentage points), and by slightly increasing their participation in the labour market (0.5 percentage points). We simulate that recent (2023) reforms of the National Childcare Scheme, which increase the generosity and the scope of the subsidy, will increase mothers' participation by one further percentage point, but also substantially decrease the demand for informal childcare. Extending childcare subsidies to informal care (such as childminders and nannies) would decrease the demand for formal childcare and further increase maternal labour supply.

Suggested Citation

  • Karina Doorley & Dora Tuda & Luke Duggan, 2025. "Will childcare subsidies increase the labour supply of mothers in Ireland?," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(2), pages 239-259, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:fistud:v:46:y:2025:i:2:p:239-259
    DOI: 10.1111/1475-5890.12399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12399
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1475-5890.12399?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fistud:v:46:y:2025:i:2:p:239-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1475-5890 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.