IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/empleg/v8y2011i2p325-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Judge‐Jury Difference in Punitive Damages Awards: Who Listens to the Supreme Court?

Author

Listed:
  • Theodore Eisenberg
  • Michael Heise

Abstract

We analyze thousands of trials from a substantial fraction of the nation's most populous counties as well as a smaller sample of less populous counties. Evidence from four major Civil Justice Survey data sets spanning more than a decade establishes that: (1) compensatory awards are strongly associated with punitive awards and (2) the punitive‐compensatory relation has not materially changed over time. But (3) 2005 data suggest, for the first time, systematic differences between judges and juries in the punitive‐compensatory relation. Despite claims that the Supreme Court's State Farm decision changed the punitive‐compensatory relation, we present evidence that the 2005 shift is not attributable to the State Farm case or to other possibly relevant likely factors such as the relative flow of personal injury cases to judges and juries, inclusion of 110 small counties in the 2005 data, or changes in the 2005 data coding. The judge‐jury difference more likely turns on unobserved factors driving the selection of cases for adjudication before judges and jurors.

Suggested Citation

  • Theodore Eisenberg & Michael Heise, 2011. "Judge‐Jury Difference in Punitive Damages Awards: Who Listens to the Supreme Court?," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 325-357, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:8:y:2011:i:2:p:325-357
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01211.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01211.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01211.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dove John A. & Dove Laura R., 2020. "US State Tort Liability Reform and Entrepreneurship," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(3), pages 1-45, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:8:y:2011:i:2:p:325-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1740-1461 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.