IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i5p6951-6965.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability Standards and Decertification: A Bayesian Analysis of SA8000

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa Turzo
  • Cecilia Chirieleison
  • Alessandro Montrone
  • Luca Scrucca

Abstract

Social Accountability 8000 (SA8000) is widely recognized as the leading certification‐based standard for social sustainability. The common assumption is that the number of certified companies increases steadily over time. However, this prevailing narrative lacks empirical support owing to the absence of comprehensive studies on SA8000 decertification. Using a beta‐binomial model estimated within a Bayesian approach to inference, we analyze a 25‐year dataset of SA8000‐certified companies. Our findings indicate that growth in certifications may not reflect a stable, long‐term commitment to the standard. Instead, a significant proportion of companies discontinue certification, often after the initial three‐year period. This study reveals that decertification rates are higher among companies with fewer certification renewals and vary considerably by industry. These insights contribute to a refined understanding of the certification and decertification patterns and highlight the need to further explore the long‐term maintenance of social accountability standards across different industries and contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa Turzo & Cecilia Chirieleison & Alessandro Montrone & Luca Scrucca, 2025. "Sustainability Standards and Decertification: A Bayesian Analysis of SA8000," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 6951-6965, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:6951-6965
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.70069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70069
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.70069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:6951-6965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.