IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i5p6807-6830.html

The Impact of ESG Performance on Organizational Resilience: Evidence From China

Author

Listed:
  • Wenbing Luo
  • Yuxin Yu
  • Xiaotian Cao
  • Mingjun Deng

Abstract

In the context of VUCA (volatile, uncertain, complex, ambiguous), organizational resilience has become increasingly important for the long‐term development of enterprises. Using data from Chinese A‐share listed enterprises between 2009 and 2022, this study examines the impact of ESG performance on organizational resilience and explores the underlying mechanisms. The results show that ESG performance has a significant positive impact on organizational resilience, and ESG primarily transmits its impact by improving investment efficiency and analyst attention, and reducing the cost of debt financing. Further analysis indicates that enterprise digitization strengthens the connection between ESG and organizational resilience. The promoting effect of ESG is more pronounced in non‐Western regions of China and in enterprises not audited by the Big Four. The existing literature exhibits certain research gaps in exploring the non‐economic effects of ESG performance. This study fills these gaps by expanding the influence mechanisms based on perspectives such as “resource‐relationship‐governance”. Our conclusions provide empirical evidence for enhancing organizational resilience and promoting the sustainable development of enterprises and society.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenbing Luo & Yuxin Yu & Xiaotian Cao & Mingjun Deng, 2025. "The Impact of ESG Performance on Organizational Resilience: Evidence From China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 6807-6830, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:6807-6830
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.70061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70061
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.70061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Essuman, Dominic & Bruce, Patience Aku & Ataburo, Henry & Asiedu-Appiah, Felicity & Boso, Nathaniel, 2022. "Linking resource slack to operational resilience: Integration of resource-based and attention-based perspectives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    2. Hao, Jing & He, Feng, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and green innovation: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    3. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Post-Print halshs-02007374, HAL.
    4. Aluchna, Maria & Roszkowska-Menkes, Maria & Kamiński, Bogumił & Bosek-Rak, Dominika, 2022. "Do institutional investors encourage firm to social disclosure? The stakeholder salience perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 674-682.
    5. Andreas Hoepner & Ioannis Oikonomou & Bert Scholtens & Michael Schröder, 2016. "The Effects of Corporate and Country Sustainability Characteristics on The Cost of Debt: An International Investigation," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1-2), pages 158-190, January.
    6. Kun Luo & Sirui Wu, 2022. "Corporate sustainability and analysts' earnings forecast accuracy: Evidence from environmental, social and governance ratings," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1465-1481, September.
    7. Yuming Zhai & Zhenghuan Cai & Han Lin & Ming Yuan & Ye Mao & Mingchuan Yu, 2022. "Does better environmental, social, and governance induce better corporate green innovation: The mediating role of financing constraints," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1513-1526, September.
    8. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    9. Gigante, Gimede & Manglaviti, Davide, 2022. "The ESG effect on the cost of debt financing: A sharp RD analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    10. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1027-1047, September.
    11. Beat Reber & Agnes Gold & Stefan Gold, 2022. "ESG Disclosure and Idiosyncratic Risk in Initial Public Offerings," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 867-886, September.
    12. Zhang, Dongyang & Lucey, Brian M., 2022. "Sustainable behaviors and firm performance: The role of financial constraints’ alleviation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 220-233.
    13. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor size and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 183-199, December.
    14. Stephanie Duchek & Sebastian Raetze & Ianina Scheuch, 2020. "The role of diversity in organizational resilience: a theoretical framework," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 387-423, July.
    15. Andersson, Thomas & Cäker, Mikael & Tengblad, Stefan & Wickelgren, Mikael, 2019. "Building traits for organizational resilience through balancing organizational structures," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 36-45.
    16. Liu, Yuhuan & Yin, Juelin, 2020. "Stakeholder Relationships and Organizational Resilience," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(5), pages 986-990, December.
    17. Kedan Wang & Shanshan Yu & Mei Mei & Xiao Yang & Geng Peng & Benfu Lv, 2023. "ESG Performance and Corporate Resilience: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Capital Allocation Efficiency Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-31, November.
    18. Zhang, Min & Tong, Lijing & Su, Jun & Cui, Zhipeng, 2015. "Analyst coverage and corporate social performance: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 76-94.
    19. Alan Gregory & Rajesh Tharyan & Julie Whittaker, 2014. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Value: Disaggregating the Effects on Cash Flow, Risk and Growth," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(4), pages 633-657, November.
    20. Wendong Lv & Yuan Wei & Xiaoyun Li & Lin Lin, 2019. "What Dimension of CSR Matters to Organizational Resilience? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, March.
    21. Hu, May & Xiong, Wanfang & Xu, Cheng, 2021. "Analyst coverage, corporate social responsibility, and firm value: Evidence from China," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    22. Joel F Houston & Hongyu Shan, 2022. "Corporate ESG Profiles and Banking Relationships," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 35(7), pages 3373-3417.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoyi Zhan & Yong Zhan & Guangjin Li, 2025. "The Cost of ESG Decoupling: How Misaligned Disclosures Undermine Corporate Sustainability?," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
    2. Liu, Lewis, 2024. "Analyst monitoring and information asymmetry reduction: U.S. evidence on environmental investment," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(1).
    3. Xinze Li & Xi Wang & Zuoxiang Zhao & Qiuyun Zhao, 2025. "ESG ratings, executive pay-for-performance sensitivity and within-firm pay gap," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Li Li & Senwei Huang & Junjie Lin & Jing Cui, 2024. "The Impact of Analysts’ Attention on the Quantity and Quality of Enterprise Green Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Companies," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, November.
    5. Yan Liu & Xiuhong Du, 2024. "How does analyst coverage influence corporate social responsibility (CSR)? The governance- and information-based perspectives," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Jinyu Chen & Xinyu Guo & Ran Liu, 2025. "ESG Rating Uncertainty and the Cost of Debt Financing," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 4328-4342, October.
    7. Hao, Jing & Sun, Ran & Gong, Xu & Zhu, Xiaoyu (Ross), 2025. "ESG and stock price crash risk revisited: Evidence from mandatory ESG disclosure policy in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Han Long & Gen-Fu Feng & Chun-Ping Chang, 2023. "How does ESG performance promote corporate green innovation?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2889-2913, August.
    9. Marsat, Sylvain & Pijourlet, Guillaume & Ullah, Muhammad, 2022. "Does environmental performance help firms to be more resilient against environmental controversies? International evidence," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    10. Qi Gong & Jiahui Gu & Zhaoyang Kong & Siyan Shen & Xiucheng Dong & Yang Li & Chade Li, 2025. "The Impact of ESG Ratings on Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-25, June.
    11. Fiordelisi, Franco & Ricci, Ornella & Santilli, Gianluca, 2023. "Environmental engagement and stock price crash risk: Evidence from the European banking industry," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    12. Bai, Xiao & Zhao, Wenyao & Tian, Geran, 2024. "ESG certification, green innovation, and firm value: A quasi-natural experiment based on SynTao Green Finance's ESG ratings: A pre-registered report," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    13. Xin Huang & Huitong Yang & Peijin Yang, 2024. "The Impact of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions on Corporate Organisational Resilience: Insights from Dynamic Capability Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Lan, Lan & Zhou, Zhifang, 2024. "Complementary or substitutive effects? The duality of digitalization and ESG on firm's innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    15. Wei Jiang & Xin Wang & Liping Liang & Mingming Leng & Xin Fang, 2025. "ESG Ratings as a Strategic Imperative: Unraveling Their Influence on Corporate Financial Performance in China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 9313-9337, June.
    16. Caterina Lucarelli & Sabrina Severini, 2024. "Anatomy of the chimera: Environmental, Social, and Governance ratings beyond the myth," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4198-4217, July.
    17. Teplova, T. & Sokolova, T. & Kissa, D. & Gurov, S., 2026. "ESG indicators as determinants of the risk of a decline in Russian stock prices in different periods: A view of Explainable AI," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 70(1), pages 157-190.
    18. Ruan, Lei & Li, Jianing & Huang, Siqi, 2024. "News or noise? ESG disclosure and stock price synchronicity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    19. Li Wei & Wu Chengshu, 2024. "Company ESG performance and institutional investor ownership preferences," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 287-307, July.
    20. Sakhr Bani-Khaled & Graça Azevedo & Jonas Oliveira, 2025. "Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors and firm value: A systematic literature review of theories and empirical evidence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(1), pages 228-260, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:6807-6830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.