Author
Listed:
- Li KaoDui
- Maxwell Kongkuah
- Noha Alessa
Abstract
As global environmental challenges intensify and resource scarcity deepens, firms in emerging economies face mounting pressure to adopt sustainable and circular business models. In this context, the role of corporate governance in enabling circular economy (CE) transformation has become increasingly critical, yet remains underexplored—particularly in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This study investigates the impact of board–ownership dynamics on CE performance, with a specific focus on the moderating role of eco‐technology intensity among listed manufacturing firms. Grounded in agency theory and the resource‐based view, the research proposes an integrated framework that links internal governance attributes and ownership structures with firm‐level CE outcomes. Using panel data from 447 firms across MENA countries between 2010 and 2022, the study employs system and difference Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimators to address endogeneity and firm‐level heterogeneity. The results reveal that gender and age diversity, independent directors, managerial, and institutional ownership significantly enhance CE performance, while CEO duality and foreign ownership undermine it. Family ownership shows no significant effect. Notably, eco‐technology intensity strengthens the influence of effective governance while mitigating the drawbacks of weaker structures. Heterogeneity analysis further indicates that the governance–CE relationship varies across regional (Middle East vs. North Africa) and production process contexts. These findings contribute to the theoretical advancement of governance and sustainability literature and offer actionable insights for firms, regulators, and policymakers committed to driving CE transitions in emerging markets.
Suggested Citation
Li KaoDui & Maxwell Kongkuah & Noha Alessa, 2025.
"Beyond Compliance: How Board–Ownership Structures and Eco‐Technology Intensity Drive Circular Economy Performance in MENA Firms,"
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 6658-6679, September.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:6658-6679
DOI: 10.1002/csr.70045
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:6658-6679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.