IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i5p6566-6585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Misperceptions of ESG Investment Impacts on Business Financial and Organizational Performance Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Alfonso Muñoz‐Acevedo
  • Francisco Seijo

Abstract

In this study, we contrast Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investment impacts on businesses' performance indicators with key market‐makers' perceptions of these impacts. We hypothesized that stakeholders would cluster around certain “frames” reflecting their ex‐ante group views of market conditions. To explore this hypothesis, we first assessed the interrelation between organizational and financial performance indicators with ESG scores through a factorial analysis using S&P500 company data for the 2015–2023 period to define market reality. We, then, analyzed ESG stakeholder perceptions by conducting a Q‐method survey of 34 market‐maker viewpoints. Six intersubjective factors, or shared “frames,” emerged amongst stakeholders: “Idealist interventionists,” “Realists,” “Skeptics,” “Skeptic non‐interventionists,” “Skeptic interventionists” and “Idealist non‐interventionists.” In light of these findings, we discuss how stakeholder misperceptions of ESG market dynamics may be reflecting directionally‐motivated reasoning, in all likelihood derived from differentiated utility‐driven incentives. These ex‐post frames differed from our expected hypotheses of ex‐ante stakeholder viewpoints.

Suggested Citation

  • Alfonso Muñoz‐Acevedo & Francisco Seijo, 2025. "Stakeholder Misperceptions of ESG Investment Impacts on Business Financial and Organizational Performance Indicators," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 6566-6585, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:6566-6585
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.70031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70031
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.70031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:6566-6585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.