Author
Listed:
- Rongbing Huang
- Yuxue Zhang
Abstract
Audit firms' development relies heavily on their stakeholders' trust, and responsible business practices are crucial for their sustainable growth. The aim of this article is to analyze the dimensions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) within audit firms and to evaluate their performance in fulfilling CSR. This article takes 40 original securities‐qualified audit firms in China from 2013 to 2022 as the sample. Using stakeholder theory, it establishes a CSR evaluation framework covering four dimensions: employees, clients, the government and industry, the environment, and philanthropy. This study applies an integrated evaluation model based on cyclic correction to evaluate these firms' performance in fulfilling CSR. The results show, first, that the CSR performance of audit firms tends to increase, but the overall level remains low; second, employee responsibility outperforms environmental and philanthropic responsibility, reflecting the unbalanced CSR fulfillment characteristics of audit firms; and third, the Big Four audit firms outperform local firms in CSR performance, highlighting the critical roles of the institutional environment and size of the organization in shaping CSR fulfillment. Overall, the level of CSR performance in audit firms is at an early stage, requiring increased regulation and guidance. This article recommends formulating unified CSR guidelines and strengthening policy support and training for audit firms to promote balanced development of CSR within the industry.
Suggested Citation
Rongbing Huang & Yuxue Zhang, 2025.
"The Dimensions and Evaluation of Audit Firms' Social Responsibility: An Analysis of 40 Audit Firms in China,"
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 6528-6545, September.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:6528-6545
DOI: 10.1002/csr.70043
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:6528-6545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.