IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i5p6106-6119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Procession Goes Inside: Employees' Dissonance Reduction Strategies in Response to Corporate Hypocrisy

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Jose Murcia
  • Maria Dolores del Rio
  • Maria Carmela Annosi

Abstract

Organizations face increasing pressure to integrate corporate social responsibility (CSR) into business strategies, yet many struggle to align CSR commitments with actual practices, leading to corporate hypocrisy—a perceived inconsistency between CSR rhetoric and behavior. While prior research explores the consequences of hypocrisy on employees, little is known about the cognitive strategies they use to navigate these inconsistencies. Drawing on Cognitive Dissonance Theory (CDT), this study examines how employees reconcile hypocrisy‐induced tensions in a multinational consulting firm, “HYDING,” where CSR commitments are structurally compartmentalized. Our findings unveil three dissonance reduction strategies: blinding (i.e., selective exposure to inconsistencies), outsourcing (i.e., denial of responsibility), and imagining (i.e., adding consonant cognitions). By uncovering the micro‐level strategies that triggered corporate hypocrisy, this study contributes to micro‐CSR literature, offering insights into mitigating hypocrisy's negative effects at the employee level.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Jose Murcia & Maria Dolores del Rio & Maria Carmela Annosi, 2025. "The Procession Goes Inside: Employees' Dissonance Reduction Strategies in Response to Corporate Hypocrisy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 6106-6119, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:6106-6119
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.70023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70023
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.70023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:6106-6119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.