Author
Listed:
- Han Lu
- Sultan Sikandar Mirza
- Chengming Huang
Abstract
This study explores how environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance‐based peer pressure influences corporate resilience, with a focus on the moderating effects of firm‐perceived economic policy uncertainty (FEPU) and governance efficiency (GE). Integrating stakeholder theory, resource dependence theory, and social norm theory, we analyze panel data from Chinese A‐share listed firms on the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges (2010–2022). Results indicate that ESG peer pressure significantly negatively shapes corporate resilience, which is mainly originated from less resilient firms where environmental and social peer pressure are primary drivers, with FEPU amplifying its adverse effects and GE attenuating them. Moreover, Covid‐19 sensitivity analysis reveals a temporal shift in the relationship between ESG peer pressure (ESGP) and corporate resilience in China. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that firm‐specific attributes—including firm size, corporate sustainability levels, industry sector (non‐manufacturing), environmental classification (non‐heavy polluting), ownership structure (state‐owned enterprises), and geographic location (central/western regions)—critically determine firms' susceptibility to ESG peer pressure. By elucidating the dynamic interplay between ESG peer pressure, external policy uncertainty, and internal governance mechanisms, this study advances theoretical discourse on competitive and regulatory drivers of corporate behavior. These findings offer actionable insights for policymakers seeking to incentivize sustainability, managers navigating competitive and regulatory landscapes, and investors evaluating ESG risks in uncertain economic contexts.
Suggested Citation
Han Lu & Sultan Sikandar Mirza & Chengming Huang, 2025.
"The Dynamics of ESG Peer Pressure and Corporate Resilience: Examining Through Firm‐Perceived EPU and Governance Efficiency Perspectives,"
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 5858-5894, September.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:5858-5894
DOI: 10.1002/csr.70001
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:5858-5894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.