Author
Abstract
With the serious ecological damage and frequent climate risks, stakeholders are increasingly concerned about corporate sustainability capability. Government agencies are also actively formulating climate policies to guide corporates to carry out ESG behaviors and promote economic and social sustainability. However, frequent climate policies may bring significant policy uncertainty, inhibiting firms' capability to improve sustainability. Based on the sample data of 742 listed firms in China from 2011 to 2022, we examine the impact of climate policy uncertainty (CPU) on corporate sustainability capability. The study finds that CPU significantly inhibits corporate sustainability capability, and this conclusion remains valid after a series of robustness tests. The mechanism tests show that CPU significantly inhibits corporate sustainability capability by reducing climate perception capability, triggering investor pessimism, and increasing bank risk. Further research found that government digital transformation can directly reduce CPU, thereby reducing the negative impact on corporate sustainability capability. The moderation analysis reveals that corporate digital transformation can significantly positively moderate the impact of CPU on corporate sustainability capability. The findings from the heterogeneity test indicate that corporates with high policy and risk sensitivity are more significantly affected by CPU in terms of their sustainability capability. Overall, this paper adds to the micro‐level analytical framework and empirical evidence of climate policy shocks. Policymakers should pay attention to the issue of climate policy uncertainty and mitigate its negative shock on the sustainable development capacity of enterprises by creating more stable climate policy expectations.
Suggested Citation
Ximeng Liu & Youtao Xiang, 2025.
"Climate Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Sustainability Capability: Evidence From ESG Performance,"
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 5302-5322, July.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:4:p:5302-5322
DOI: 10.1002/csr.3244
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:4:p:5302-5322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.