IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i3p4216-4234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facing the Risk of Greenwashing in the ESG Report of Global Companies: The Importance of Life Cycle Thinking

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Ruggeri
  • Giuliana Vinci
  • Roberto Ruggieri
  • Marco Savastano

Abstract

Accurate reporting on the sustainability of business value propositions must be supported by reliable data sources and sound methodologies such as life cycle assessment (LCA). Showing commitment to more responsible activity without quantifying business impacts, or quantifying them only partially, could fall into greenwashing practices. This research aims to analyze to what extent life cycle thinking tools are widespread in global companies' sustainability reports to determine whether companies are practicing greenwashing. The assessment was done through a review of non‐financial statements of all the Global Fortune 500 companies, with the results showing that they rarely refer to LCA. More in detail, 80% of the sample does not quantify their environmental impacts through LCA, and almost all of the remaining 20% quantify only a small portion of their impacts. Only two companies use the Social Life Cycle Assessment. Accordingly, large companies are still reluctant to show their actual emissions, as they might contradict their sustainability narratives. This leads to reinforcing the belief that many companies are not making significant efforts to engage in sustainability strategies but are increasingly practicing greenwashing, making their products and operations appear more sustainable than they are.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Ruggeri & Giuliana Vinci & Roberto Ruggieri & Marco Savastano, 2025. "Facing the Risk of Greenwashing in the ESG Report of Global Companies: The Importance of Life Cycle Thinking," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 4216-4234, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:4216-4234
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.3178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3178
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.3178?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:4216-4234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.