IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i3p3905-3927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Disclosure Strategies: Evidence From Financial Statement Comparability

Author

Listed:
  • Zhichao Zhang
  • Bingzhen Sun

Abstract

This study explores how climate policy uncertainty (CPU) impacts corporate financial reporting strategies. We employ a news‐based CPU measure using bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT), an advanced deep learning model known for its sophisticated natural language processing capabilities. Based on a sample of Chinese listed companies from 2010 to 2023, we find a negative relationship between CPU and financial statement comparability. This effect is more pronounced in firms with high pollution levels or significant environmental costs. Our mechanism tests reveal that CPU leads to more abnormal transactions and discretionary reporting, which further reduces comparability. Additionally, CPU significantly affects discretionary accounting comparability and diminishes the textual comparability of MD&A and accounting policy disclosures. Overall, our findings indicate that higher levels of CPU are associated with a greater likelihood of unusual corporate behaviors and strategic reporting decisions, resulting in decreased financial statement comparability.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhichao Zhang & Bingzhen Sun, 2025. "Climate Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Disclosure Strategies: Evidence From Financial Statement Comparability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3905-3927, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:3905-3927
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.3164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3164
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.3164?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:3905-3927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.