IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i3p3545-3559.html

Advantages of ESG Indexes Compared to Traditional Ones in Predicting Stock Prices

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Plastun
  • Anna Vorontsova
  • Inna Makarenko
  • Yuriy Bilan
  • Samer Khouri
  • Dalia Streimikiene

Abstract

This paper investigates the predictability of traditional and ESG indices in the Ukrainian stock market, examining potential differences between models. The study tests two hypotheses: (H1) ESG indices exhibit lower predictability than traditional indices, and (H2) different forecasting models should be applied to ESG and conventional indices. Various forecasting models, including AR, ARIMA, ARCH, GARCH, TGARCH, Logit, and Probit regressions, are employed, along with additional tests, using daily data from the Ukrainian stock market (UX, PFTS, and WIG indices) spanning 2015–2022. The findings confirm both hypotheses for the case of returns, indicating less predictability for ESG indices and the need for distinct models. For volatility, there is limited evidence supporting Hypothesis 1, but Hypothesis 2 is confirmed. Possible factors explaining the results include higher information transparency, liquidity, and trading activity in ESG indices. The research has implications for academics and practitioners, emphasizing the importance of employing different models for forecasting ESG and traditional indices. It also highlights the preference for traditional indices in trading and speculative activities. The study suggests that a shift toward ESG indices represents a move toward more efficient markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Plastun & Anna Vorontsova & Inna Makarenko & Yuriy Bilan & Samer Khouri & Dalia Streimikiene, 2025. "Advantages of ESG Indexes Compared to Traditional Ones in Predicting Stock Prices," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3545-3559, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:3545-3559
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.3149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3149
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.3149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Umar, Zaghum & Kenourgios, Dimitris & Papathanasiou, Sypros, 2020. "The static and dynamic connectedness of environmental, social, and governance investments: International evidence," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 112-124.
    2. Pruethsan Sutthichaimethee & Grzegorz Mentel & Volodymyr Voloshyn & Halyna Mishchuk & Yuriy Bilan, 2024. "Modeling the Efficiency of Resource Consumption Management in Construction Under Sustainability Policy: Enriching the DSEM-ARIMA Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos, 2022. "Energy Communities Overview: Managerial Policies, Economic Aspects, Technologies, and Models," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-45, November.
    4. Sharma, Gagan Deep & Sarker, Tapan & Rao, Amar & Talan, Gaurav & Jain, Mansi, 2022. "Revisiting conventional and green finance spillover in post-COVID world: Evidence from robust econometric models," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    5. Joanna Górka & Katarzyna Kuziak, 2022. "Volatility Modeling and Dependence Structure of ESG and Conventional Investments," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Leite, Paulo & Cortez, Maria Céu, 2015. "Performance of European socially responsible funds during market crises: Evidence from France," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 132-141.
    7. Meir Statman, 2000. "Socially Responsible Mutual Funds (corrected)," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(3), pages 30-39, May.
    8. repec:eme:mfppss:v:41:y:2015:i:11:p:1176-1201 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Riccardo Savio & Edoardo D’Andrassi & Francesca Ventimiglia, 2023. "A Systematic Literature Review on ESG during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Hooi Hooi Lean & Fabio Pizzutilo & Kimberly Gleason, 2023. "Portfolio performance implications of investment in renewable energy equities: Green versus gray," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2990-3005, November.
    3. de Boyrie, Maria E. & Pavlova, Ivelina, 2024. "Connectedness with commodities in emerging markets: ESG leaders vs. conventional indexes," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Qureshi, Fiza & Qureshi, Saba & Ismail, Izlin & Yarovaya, Larisa, 2025. "Unlocking economic insights: ESG integration, market dynamics and sustainable transitions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Guglielmo Maria Caporale & Luis Gil-Alana & Alex Plastun & Inna Makarenko, 2022. "Persistence in ESG and conventional stock market indices," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 46(4), pages 678-703, October.
    6. Staněk Gyönyör, Lucie & Horváth, Matúš, 2024. "Does ESG affect stock market dependence? An empirical exploration of S&P 1200 companies shows the divergent nature of E–S–G pillars," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    7. Carlos Estevez‐Mendoza & Juan Infante, 2025. "Evolution and relevance of research on Environmental, Social, and Governance factors," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 1545-1566, March.
    8. Li, Dan & Li, Hong, 2025. "Socially responsible investment and fund performance: The moderating roles of mutual funds' operating environments," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Emanuela Giacomini & Nicoletta Marinelli & Luca Riccetti, 2023. "The impact at stake: Risk and return in publicly listed social impact firms," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 713-741, April.
    10. Díaz, Antonio & Esparcia, Carlos & López, Raquel, 2022. "The diversifying role of socially responsible investments during the COVID-19 crisis: A risk management and portfolio performance analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 39-60.
    11. Lagan Jindal, 2025. "Performance and investment styles of green mutual funds: a cross-country analysis," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(7), pages 725-740, December.
    12. Ali, Shoaib & Naveed, Muhammad & Yousaf, Imran & Khattak, Muhammad Sualeh, 2024. "From cryptos to consciousness: Dynamics of return and volatility spillover between green cryptocurrencies and G7 markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    13. Hugo S. Gonçalves & Sérgio Moro, 2023. "On the economic impacts of COVID‐19: A text mining literature analysis," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 375-394, February.
    14. Pruethsan Sutthichaimethee & Worawat Sa-Ngiamvibool & Buncha Wattana & Jianhui Luo & Supannika Wattana, 2025. "Enhancing Sustainable Strategic Governance for Energy-Consumption Reduction Towards Carbon Neutrality in the Energy and Transportation Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-24, March.
    15. Karim, Sitara & Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Lucey, Brian M., 2022. "Do ethics outpace sins?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PB).
    16. Dippi Verma & Rameesha Kalra & Santosh Satyanarayan Baheti, 2025. "Examining the Domain of Green Finance Through Bibliometric Research Analysis of 22 Years (2000–2022): An Analytical Retrospective," Vision, , vol. 29(2), pages 244-265, April.
    17. Fernando Muñoz, 2021. "Sin sectors and negative screening," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 216-230, April.
    18. Guillermo Badía & Luis Ferruz & Maria Céu Cortez, 2021. "The performance of social responsible investing from retail investors' perspective: international evidence," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 6074-6088, October.
    19. Mirza, Nawazish & Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Ha Nguyen, Thi Thu & Arfaoui, Nadia & Oliyide, Johnson A., 2023. "Are sustainable investments interdependent? The international evidence," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    20. Arfaoui, Nadia & Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Boubaker, Sabri & Mirza, Nawazish & Karim, Sitara, 2023. "Interdependence of clean energy and green markets with cryptocurrencies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:3545-3559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.